linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
Cc: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com,
	davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	'Sneha Narnakaje' <nsnehaprabha@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] nand/davinci: Fix comment to match the code
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:23:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100826062357.GA874@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <045301cb44d3$2551fef0$6ff5fcd0$@raj@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1970 bytes --]

Sudhakar,

> > commit 1c3275b656045aff9a75bb2c9f3251af1043ebb3
> > Author: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
> > Date:   Tue Jul 20 15:24:01 2010 -0700
> > 
> >     mtd: nand: davinci: correct 4-bit error correction
> >     
> >     On TI's DA830/OMAP-L137, DA850/OMAP-L138 and DM365, after setting the
> >     4BITECC_ADD_CALC_START bit in the NAND Flash control register to 1 and
> >     before waiting for the NAND Flash status register to be equal to 1, 2 or
> >     3, we have to wait till the ECC HW goes to correction state.  Without this
> >     wait, ECC correction calculations will not be proper.
> >     
> >     This has been tested on DA830/OMAP-L137, DA850/OMAP-L138, DM355 and DM365
> >     EVMs.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com>
> >     Acked-by: Sneha Narnakaje <nsnehaprabha@ti.com>
> >     Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >     Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
> >     Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
> > 
> > then it is already in upstream in Linus' tree. I do not have anything else from you.
> > 
> 
> Yes, this was the patch I was talking about. But this patch seems little
> different than the one I submitted to linux-mtd list at
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/59180/. But I can submit another patch
> which corrects it. 
> 
> Wolfram Sang,
> Do you agree that in the above link which shows the patch I have submitted,
> the comment matches the code?

Yes. Also, where and how 'timeo' is handled is much better in this patch. If
you create an update patch to make the code look like in the patchwork-link,
you can instantly add my:

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>

Thanks,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-26  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-25 12:18 [RFC] nand/davinci: Fix comment to match the code Wolfram Sang
2010-08-25 12:27 ` Sudhakar Rajashekhara
2010-08-25 12:55   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-08-25 13:30     ` Wolfram Sang
2010-08-26  3:59     ` Sudhakar Rajashekhara
2010-08-26  6:23       ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2010-09-01  8:05       ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-01 23:14 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-03 10:35   ` [PATCH] nand/davinci: relax a timeout for ECC-initialization Wolfram Sang
2010-09-03 11:12     ` Sudhakar Rajashekhara
2010-09-03 12:15       ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-07  8:00     ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100826062357.GA874@pengutronix.de \
    --to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
    --cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nsnehaprabha@ti.com \
    --cc=sudhakar.raj@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).