From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux equivalent of u-boot's "nand scrub" (erasing blocks even when OOB says "bad")
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 03:43:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009220343.33025.vapier.adi@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284278043.1783.10.camel@brekeke>
On Sunday, September 12, 2010 03:54:03 Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 00:03 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 02:32, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > It will be confusing if the same word is used in MTD for "unmarking"
> > > eraseblocks. How about: 'force erase' or 'bad erase' ?
> >
> > that makes it sound like an option to the existing MEMERASE operation.
> >
> > so i guess what if we just do that -- extend the erase_info_user
> >
> > structure to contain a flags field and add a MEMERASE2 that works with
> > the larger structure ? for now we'd only have one option (FORCE), but
> > it makes it easy to extend in the future.
>
> Ohh, this was so stupid of me to not ask people to add extra fields to
> 'struct erase_info_user64' which was introduced relatively recently... I
> always add extra fields to ioctl data structures...
>
> But yeah, what you say sounds ok to me.
here's a POC that works for me. with a simple tweak to `flash_eraseall`, i
can now recover my mtd devices with funky OOB layouts.
ive only extended MEMERASE64 as i believe the non-64 variants are EOL ? or
should i also extend the 32bit interface as well ?
-mike
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c
index 5b081cb..68c2864 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c
@@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ static int mtd_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file
*file,
case MEMERASE:
case MEMERASE64:
+ case MEMERASE64_FLAGS:
{
struct erase_info *erase;
@@ -538,6 +539,17 @@ static int mtd_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file
*file,
}
erase->addr = einfo64.start;
erase->len = einfo64.length;
+ } else if (cmd == MEMERASE64_FLAGS) {
+ struct erase_info_user64_flags einfo64;
+
+ if (copy_from_user(&einfo64, argp,
+ sizeof(struct erase_info_user64_flags))) {
+ kfree(erase);
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
+ erase->addr = einfo64.start;
+ erase->len = einfo64.length;
+ erase->flags = einfo64.flags;
} else {
struct erase_info_user einfo32;
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index 8f2958f..e440d84 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -2354,7 +2354,8 @@ int nand_erase_nand(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct
erase_info *instr,
/*
* heck if we have a bad block, we do not erase bad blocks !
*/
- if (nand_block_checkbad(mtd, ((loff_t) page) <<
+ if (!(instr->flags & MTD_ERASE_BADBLOCKS) &&
+ nand_block_checkbad(mtd, ((loff_t) page) <<
chip->page_shift, 0, allowbbt)) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: attempt to erase a bad block "
"at page 0x%08x\n", __func__, page);
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
index 0f32a9b..f1cda73 100644
--- a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
+++ b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct erase_info {
struct mtd_info *mtd;
uint64_t addr;
uint64_t len;
+ uint32_t flags;
uint64_t fail_addr;
u_long time;
u_long retries;
diff --git a/include/mtd/mtd-abi.h b/include/mtd/mtd-abi.h
index be51ae2..fef14ba 100644
--- a/include/mtd/mtd-abi.h
+++ b/include/mtd/mtd-abi.h
@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ struct erase_info_user64 {
__u64 length;
};
+struct erase_info_user64_flags {
+ __u64 start;
+ __u64 length;
+ __u32 flags;
+};
+
struct mtd_oob_buf {
__u32 start;
__u32 length;
@@ -61,6 +67,9 @@ struct mtd_oob_buf64 {
#define MTD_OTP_FACTORY 1
#define MTD_OTP_USER 2
+/* Erase flags */
+#define MTD_ERASE_BADBLOCKS 0x1
+
struct mtd_info_user {
__u8 type;
__u32 flags;
@@ -110,6 +119,7 @@ struct otp_info {
#define MEMERASE64 _IOW('M', 20, struct erase_info_user64)
#define MEMWRITEOOB64 _IOWR('M', 21, struct mtd_oob_buf64)
#define MEMREADOOB64 _IOWR('M', 22, struct mtd_oob_buf64)
+#define MEMERASE64_FLAGS _IOW('M', 23, struct erase_info_user64_flags)
/*
* Obsolete legacy interface. Keep it in order not to break userspace
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-22 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-10 23:53 linux equivalent of u-boot's "nand scrub" (erasing blocks even when OOB says "bad") Mike Frysinger
2010-09-11 6:32 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-12 4:03 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-09-12 7:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-22 7:43 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2010-09-23 12:28 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-23 19:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-09-24 8:47 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-13 5:54 ` linux equivalent of u-boot's "nand scrub" (erasing blocks even whenOOB " Jon Povey
2010-09-13 6:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-09-14 1:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-09-14 1:53 ` Jon Povey
2010-09-14 1:59 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201009220343.33025.vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--to=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).