From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OykYU-00011Y-Ul for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:05:40 +0000 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:05:34 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Fl=E1vio?= Silveira Subject: Re: [Help] SST39VF6401B Support Message-ID: <20100923120534.GD2994@pengutronix.de> References: <74A5BE60138147F696E151AACD52EDEE@THOR> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9ADF8FXzFeE7X4jE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <74A5BE60138147F696E151AACD52EDEE@THOR> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Yegor Yefremov List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --9ADF8FXzFeE7X4jE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Thanks for your response. Does this mean this chip isn't CFI > compliant? Like, datasheet says it is, but not really. SST? Broken CFI happened to me, too :( http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/51027/ Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --9ADF8FXzFeE7X4jE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkybQo4ACgkQD27XaX1/VRuz6wCdE5K1WwLuhS7IqNJQGwH9/VYd Ca4AoKYdwFImqRUi2d0ul4CU7HmwMe1f =uOT9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9ADF8FXzFeE7X4jE--