From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1P7o5U-0005jX-5N for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:41:09 +0000 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:41:04 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: yidong zhang Subject: Re: Re :Re: [Help] SST39VF6401B Support Message-ID: <20101018114104.GC15440@pengutronix.de> References: <20101016100744.GA10815@pengutronix.de> <20101016131752.GA2676@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: glecerf@gmail.com, taliaferro62@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David.Woodhouse@intel.com, yegorslists@googlemail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:00:46PM +0800, yidong zhang wrote: > hi > The 39VF*-B-Version flashes in the cfi_nopri_fixup_table don't work > well in the current code. Because of the mistaken use of > command(0x30) in the 6th bus cycle, which should be 0x50. I think the > 39VF*-B-Version flashes should be removed form the CFI probe mode. Or > maybe the erase operation should be changed for the Compatibility. Or we put in a variable like the unlock-address? --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAky8Mk8ACgkQD27XaX1/VRtD1QCgvhKREHwzceC1STdpZXJ2qrum Wg4An0JXJSQTkr5eShXUdykOn6lhlvbt =3BkZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o--