From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PUqxQ-00026a-VR for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:24:07 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:23:52 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Adrian Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] OMAP2/3: GPMC: put sync_clk value in picoseconds instead of nanoseconds Message-ID: <20101221012352.GI5941@atomide.com> References: <20101213122042.20685.52929.sendpatchset@ahunter-work.research.nokia.com> <20101213122108.20685.1920.sendpatchset@ahunter-work.research.nokia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101213122108.20685.1920.sendpatchset@ahunter-work.research.nokia.com> Cc: linux-mtd Mailing List , Kyungmin Park , David Woodhouse , Artem Bityutskiy List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Adrian Hunter [101213 04:21]: > From c52e0cdeedffb7a0f9818ad3d6296d1f51b8669d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Adrian Hunter > Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:48:27 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 4/7] OMAP2/3: GPMC: put sync_clk value in picoseconds instead of nanoseconds > > The calculations done with sync_clk are anyway in picoseconds > and switching to picoseconds allows sync_clk values that are > not a whole number of nanoseconds - which is sometimes the Can you please post patches 4 - 5 of this series as separate patches and Cc linux-omap and linux-arm-kernel mailing lists? This is assuming patches 4 - 5 do not have dependencies to the other patches in the series.. Thanks, Tony