From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PanZd-000454-C6 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:00:05 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:00:03 +0100 From: Anatolij Gustschin To: Guillaume LECERF Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mtd: cfi: add writebufsize initialization Message-ID: <20110106120003.0ba35de9@wker> In-Reply-To: References: <292342500.2538.65.camel@localhost> <1292539339-25111-3-git-send-email-agust@denx.de> <1292942724.2286.57.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Woodhouse , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:32:11 +0100 Guillaume LECERF wrote: > 2010/12/21 Artem Bityutskiy : > > Yes, fair question, Anatolij? > > Hi all. > > Anatolij, what about such patches ? > Note : this is totally untested ;) NACK. This is wrong. We need to export the real physical write buffer size of _one_ chip to UBI. Otherwise we will run into the same trouble and will end up with an unmountable UBIFS partition again. It doesn't even make sense to test your two patches, it won't work. Thanks, Anatolij