From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:57:35 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: "Ghorai, Sukumar" Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v8 3/7] omap: gpmc: enable irq mode in gpmc Message-ID: <20110125165735.GL13589@atomide.com> References: <1295443503-14515-1-git-send-email-s-ghorai@ti.com> <1295443503-14515-4-git-send-email-s-ghorai@ti.com> <20110121184020.GD11678@atomide.com> <2A3DCF3DA181AD40BDE86A3150B27B6B036A8DB549@dbde02.ent.ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2A3DCF3DA181AD40BDE86A3150B27B6B036A8DB549@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Ghorai, Sukumar [110122 09:53]: > > > > I think I've commented on this before, but why don't you make gpmc_init > > a subsys_initcall? There should be no reason to call this earlier. > > If something does not work because of that, then that issue must be > > fixed. > > [Ghorai] You suggested the same in previous v5 and v6; and I mentioned > the issues [1] that - nand_init()called before subsys_initcall(gpmc_init); > Let me know if I am missing anything again. There should not be any need to call nand_init early either. We want to initialize as much as possible late so we have proper console error messages. Tony