From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lunge.mit.edu ([18.54.1.69] helo=lunge.queued.net) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PovEb-00083D-Pe for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:00:46 +0000 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 02:00:28 -0800 From: Andres Salomon To: dedekind1@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/17] t7166xb: mfd_cell is now implicitly available to drivers Message-ID: <20110214020028.2449dbe4@debxo> In-Reply-To: <1297675064.2854.12.camel@localhost> References: <20110211181101.3a4325e4@queued.net> <1297675064.2854.12.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Mark Brown , David Woodhouse , Samuel Ortiz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:17:44 +0200 Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 18:11 -0800, Andres Salomon wrote: > > No need to explicitly set the cell's platform_data/data_size. > > > > Modify clients to use mfd_get_cell helper function instead of > > accessing platform_data directly. > > Wold it be possible to separate out MTD-related changes? > It's possible, sure. Patch 09 is the only one that touches drivers/mtd. It would introduce build and/or runtime problems if mtd and mfd trees get out of synch, however. I was hoping to get subsystem maintainer ACKs and run everything through the mfd tree, if possible (though I haven't heard any feedback from Samuel about any of this yet).