* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 32242] New: irq 18, nobody cared, nor did irqpoll [not found] <bug-32242-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> @ 2011-03-30 23:51 ` Andrew Morton 2011-03-31 10:59 ` Harald Dunkel 2011-03-31 13:32 ` Josh Boyer 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2011-03-30 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: harri; +Cc: linux-mtd, bugzilla-daemon, linux-mmc, bugme-daemon, linux-acpi (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:06:17 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32242 > > Summary: irq 18, nobody cared, nor did irqpoll > Product: Drivers > Version: 2.5 > Kernel Version: 2.6.38.2 Is this a regression? Was 2.6.37 OK? > Platform: All > OS/Version: Linux > Tree: Mainline > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P1 > Component: Other > AssignedTo: drivers_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org > ReportedBy: harri@afaics.de > Regression: No > > > Created an attachment (id=52622) > --> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=52622) > kernel config file > > I got this at boot time of my laptop: > > [ 11.837498] irq 18: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) > [ 11.837503] Pid: 1618, comm: echo Not tainted 2.6.38.2 #1 > [ 11.837504] Call Trace: > [ 11.837506] <IRQ> [<ffffffff810723af>] ? > __report_bad_irq.clone.2+0x30/0x7c > [ 11.837515] [<ffffffff81072502>] ? note_interrupt+0x107/0x179 > [ 11.837518] [<ffffffff81072f8e>] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa6/0xd4 > [ 11.837522] [<ffffffff810036cc>] ? call_softirq+0x1c/0x28 > [ 11.837525] [<ffffffff8100514f>] ? handle_irq+0x17/0x1d > [ 11.837527] [<ffffffff81004e80>] ? do_IRQ+0x45/0xad > [ 11.837532] [<ffffffff812a2d13>] ? ret_from_intr+0x0/0xe > [ 11.837533] <EOI> [<ffffffff81175b76>] ? cfb_imageblit+0x19e/0x434 > [ 11.837539] [<ffffffff812a2d0e>] ? common_interrupt+0xe/0x13 > [ 11.837543] [<ffffffff81170fa7>] ? bit_putcs+0x3c0/0x455 > [ 11.837546] [<ffffffff81170bcb>] ? bit_cursor+0x439/0x455 > [ 11.837549] [<ffffffff8116b93b>] ? fbcon_putcs+0xef/0xfe > [ 11.837551] [<ffffffff81170be7>] ? bit_putcs+0x0/0x455 > [ 11.837554] [<ffffffff8116ef5b>] ? fbcon_redraw.clone.15+0xcb/0x160 > [ 11.837557] [<ffffffff8116f60e>] ? fbcon_scroll+0x61e/0xb9d > [ 11.837561] [<ffffffff811b2436>] ? scrup+0x67/0xd4 > [ 11.837563] [<ffffffff811b25c7>] ? lf+0x25/0x58 > [ 11.837566] [<ffffffff811b58fb>] ? do_con_write+0x8aa/0x1e40 > [ 11.837569] [<ffffffff81170792>] ? bit_cursor+0x0/0x455 > [ 11.837572] [<ffffffff811b6ed5>] ? con_write+0xd/0x23 > [ 11.837575] [<ffffffff811a5593>] ? do_output_char+0x87/0x199 > [ 11.837578] [<ffffffff811a56d4>] ? process_output+0x2f/0x43 > [ 11.837580] [<ffffffff811a6063>] ? n_tty_write+0x26b/0x34d > [ 11.837584] [<ffffffff8103018a>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x11 > [ 11.837587] [<ffffffff811a3374>] ? tty_write+0x1ad/0x231 > [ 11.837589] [<ffffffff811a5df8>] ? n_tty_write+0x0/0x34d > [ 11.837593] [<ffffffff810b7b60>] ? vfs_write+0xaf/0x129 > [ 11.837596] [<ffffffff810b7db3>] ? sys_write+0x45/0x6e > [ 11.837598] [<ffffffff8100287b>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > [ 11.837600] handlers: > [ 11.837601] [<ffffffffa01f80a7>] (sdhci_irq+0x0/0x4d5 [sdhci]) > [ 11.837621] [<ffffffffa05bb871>] (r852_irq+0x0/0x201 [r852]) So both sdhci_irq and r852_irq were looking at the IRQ, but neither of them were interested in it. Could be that the bug lies in neither driver, at that something went wrong with the system setup. ACPI? > [ 11.837625] Disabling IRQ #18 > > Booting with irqpoll as suggested did not help. With this option set I got > > [ 31.135445] irq 18: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) > [ 31.136345] Pid: 0, comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 2.6.38.2 #1 > [ 31.136345] Call Trace: > [ 31.136345] <IRQ> [<ffffffff810723af>] ? > __report_bad_irq.clone.2+0x30/0x7c > [ 31.136345] [<ffffffff81072502>] ? note_interrupt+0x107/0x179 > [ 31.136345] [<ffffffff81072f8e>] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa6/0xd4 > [ 31.136345] [<ffffffff8100514f>] ? handle_irq+0x17/0x1d > [ 31.136345] [<ffffffff81004e80>] ? do_IRQ+0x45/0xad > [ 31.136345] [<ffffffff812a2d13>] ? ret_from_intr+0x0/0xe > [ 31.136345] <EOI> [<ffffffffa0416f7c>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0xd2/0x104 > [processor] > [ 31.136345] [<ffffffffa0416f77>] ? acpi_idle_enter_simple+0xcd/0x104 > [processor] > [ 31.136345] [<ffffffff81208efc>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x91/0xce > [ 31.136345] [<ffffffff81001182>] ? cpu_idle+0x4a/0x64 > [ 31.136345] handlers: > [ 31.136345] [<ffffffffa01d80a7>] (sdhci_irq+0x0/0x4d5 [sdhci]) > [ 31.136345] [<ffffffffa06c1871>] (r852_irq+0x0/0x201 [r852]) > [ 31.136345] Disabling IRQ #18 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 32242] New: irq 18, nobody cared, nor did irqpoll 2011-03-30 23:51 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 32242] New: irq 18, nobody cared, nor did irqpoll Andrew Morton @ 2011-03-31 10:59 ` Harald Dunkel 2011-03-31 13:32 ` Josh Boyer 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Harald Dunkel @ 2011-03-31 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mtd, bugzilla-daemon, linux-mmc, bugme-daemon, linux-acpi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/31/11 01:51, Andrew Morton wrote: > > So both sdhci_irq and r852_irq were looking at the IRQ, but neither of > them were interested in it. > > Could be that the bug lies in neither driver, at that something went > wrong with the system setup. ACPI? > Currently I cannot reproduce it, with or without acpi. /var/log/messages shows this morning: [ 1.004550] sdhci: Secure Digital Host Controller Interface driver [ 1.004552] sdhci: Copyright(c) Pierre Ossman [ 1.005643] sdhci-pci 0000:03:01.1: SDHCI controller found [1180:0822] (rev 22) [ 1.005662] sdhci-pci 0000:03:01.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 [ 1.007252] tg3.c:v3.116 (December 3, 2010) [ 1.007268] tg3 0000:09:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 [ 1.007513] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs [ 1.007537] usbcore: registered new interface driver hub [ 1.010765] mmc0: SDHCI controller on PCI [0000:03:01.1] using DMA [ 1.010775] sdhci-pci 0000:03:01.2: SDHCI controller found [1180:0843] (rev 12) [ 1.010786] sdhci-pci 0000:03:01.2: PCI INT B -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 [ 1.013877] mmc1: SDHCI controller on PCI [0000:03:01.2] using DMA : : [ 8.216702] r852 0000:03:01.4: PCI INT B -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 [ 8.243648] r852: driver loaded succesfully :-{ When it comes back I will try to reboot with acpi=off. Regards Harri -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2UXoAACgkQUTlbRTxpHjcragCghaLRrZJn7pkhbpkzfK0KjstI Sw8AniBuFLr0kIpE6ImtJ0b4hdQlILzW =ukS3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 32242] New: irq 18, nobody cared, nor did irqpoll 2011-03-30 23:51 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 32242] New: irq 18, nobody cared, nor did irqpoll Andrew Morton 2011-03-31 10:59 ` Harald Dunkel @ 2011-03-31 13:32 ` Josh Boyer 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Josh Boyer @ 2011-03-31 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton Cc: bugzilla-daemon, linux-mmc, harri, linux-acpi, linux-mtd, bugme-daemon On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >> I got this at boot time of my laptop: >> >> [ 11.837498] irq 18: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) >> [ 11.837503] Pid: 1618, comm: echo Not tainted 2.6.38.2 #1 >> [ 11.837504] Call Trace: >> [ 11.837506] <IRQ> [<ffffffff810723af>] ? >> __report_bad_irq.clone.2+0x30/0x7c >> [ 11.837515] [<ffffffff81072502>] ? note_interrupt+0x107/0x179 >> [ 11.837518] [<ffffffff81072f8e>] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa6/0xd4 >> [ 11.837522] [<ffffffff810036cc>] ? call_softirq+0x1c/0x28 >> [ 11.837525] [<ffffffff8100514f>] ? handle_irq+0x17/0x1d >> [ 11.837527] [<ffffffff81004e80>] ? do_IRQ+0x45/0xad >> [ 11.837532] [<ffffffff812a2d13>] ? ret_from_intr+0x0/0xe >> [ 11.837533] <EOI> [<ffffffff81175b76>] ? cfb_imageblit+0x19e/0x434 >> [ 11.837539] [<ffffffff812a2d0e>] ? common_interrupt+0xe/0x13 >> [ 11.837543] [<ffffffff81170fa7>] ? bit_putcs+0x3c0/0x455 >> [ 11.837546] [<ffffffff81170bcb>] ? bit_cursor+0x439/0x455 >> [ 11.837549] [<ffffffff8116b93b>] ? fbcon_putcs+0xef/0xfe >> [ 11.837551] [<ffffffff81170be7>] ? bit_putcs+0x0/0x455 >> [ 11.837554] [<ffffffff8116ef5b>] ? fbcon_redraw.clone.15+0xcb/0x160 >> [ 11.837557] [<ffffffff8116f60e>] ? fbcon_scroll+0x61e/0xb9d >> [ 11.837561] [<ffffffff811b2436>] ? scrup+0x67/0xd4 >> [ 11.837563] [<ffffffff811b25c7>] ? lf+0x25/0x58 >> [ 11.837566] [<ffffffff811b58fb>] ? do_con_write+0x8aa/0x1e40 >> [ 11.837569] [<ffffffff81170792>] ? bit_cursor+0x0/0x455 >> [ 11.837572] [<ffffffff811b6ed5>] ? con_write+0xd/0x23 >> [ 11.837575] [<ffffffff811a5593>] ? do_output_char+0x87/0x199 >> [ 11.837578] [<ffffffff811a56d4>] ? process_output+0x2f/0x43 >> [ 11.837580] [<ffffffff811a6063>] ? n_tty_write+0x26b/0x34d >> [ 11.837584] [<ffffffff8103018a>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x11 >> [ 11.837587] [<ffffffff811a3374>] ? tty_write+0x1ad/0x231 >> [ 11.837589] [<ffffffff811a5df8>] ? n_tty_write+0x0/0x34d >> [ 11.837593] [<ffffffff810b7b60>] ? vfs_write+0xaf/0x129 >> [ 11.837596] [<ffffffff810b7db3>] ? sys_write+0x45/0x6e >> [ 11.837598] [<ffffffff8100287b>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b >> [ 11.837600] handlers: >> [ 11.837601] [<ffffffffa01f80a7>] (sdhci_irq+0x0/0x4d5 [sdhci]) >> [ 11.837621] [<ffffffffa05bb871>] (r852_irq+0x0/0x201 [r852]) > > So both sdhci_irq and r852_irq were looking at the IRQ, but neither of > them were interested in it. > > Could be that the bug lies in neither driver, at that something went > wrong with the system setup. ACPI? I don't see anything that would implicate the MTD layer at all. SDHCI is unrelated to MTD. Just an FYI. josh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-31 13:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-32242-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2011-03-30 23:51 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 32242] New: irq 18, nobody cared, nor did irqpoll Andrew Morton
2011-03-31 10:59 ` Harald Dunkel
2011-03-31 13:32 ` Josh Boyer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox