From: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com>
To: Vipin Kumar <vipin.kumar@st.com>
Cc: "Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com" <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>,
Viresh KUMAR <viresh.kumar@st.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"David.Woodhouse@intel.com" <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Newly erased page read workaround
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 14:14:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110401121447.GA19151@parrot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9595AB.1050604@st.com>
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:06:51AM +0100, Vipin Kumar wrote:
> That's the problem. Ideally the ecc should have been programmed in OOB and then
> the driver would be able to correct the flipped bits. The problem happens only
> if we try to read the erased pages.
>
> >> Ideally, any filesystem would mark it as a bad block
> >
> > That's the point - no. This is normal on modern flashes.
> >
> > I think one solution could be that you make your check more
> > sophisticated. You check for 0xFFs, if this is not true, you see is this
> > "almost all 0xFFs" and count amount of non-0xFF bits. If the count is,
> > say, 2, you assume this page contains all 0xFFs plus 2 bit-flips. But
> > I'm not sure it would work.
> >
> > Anyway, If you do not care about such bit-flips for your SoC - fine. I
> > just wanted you to understand and accept the issue and write about it in
> > the comment. And I also wanted you to _not_ do expensive 0xFF comparison
> > every time - but it seems you accepted this :-)
> >
>
> Yes, I had to accept this :-)
> The flip side is that the hardware itself should not report errors when it
> reads all ff data and ff ecc..It should assume it as an erased page and not
> report any errors
Hello Vipin,
Did you consider this idea: if you have an unused byte available in oob,
program it to 0x00 when a page is programmed.
That way, you just need to check a single byte when you read a page in order
to distinguish erased pages from programmed pages. And by counting the number
of 1s in the byte, you can be robust to bitflips.
As a special refinement, you could also "cleanup" pages detected as erased, in
order to iron out possible bitflips.
I think that this method is used by Micron for their internal on-die ecc engine:
they add a parity byte (0x00 or 0x01) to their BCH code, which can be used to:
1) detect failures (using parity) when the max error count is reached
2) distinguish between erased and programmed pages
Best Regards,
Ivan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-01 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-24 6:10 [PATCH] Newly erased page read workaround Viresh Kumar
2011-02-24 9:38 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-24 10:20 ` Vipin Kumar
2011-02-24 11:10 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-24 11:36 ` Vipin Kumar
2011-03-22 4:36 ` viresh kumar
2011-03-31 13:51 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 6:28 ` Vipin Kumar
2011-04-01 6:51 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 8:33 ` Vipin Kumar
2011-04-01 8:39 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 9:06 ` Vipin Kumar
2011-04-01 9:42 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 12:14 ` Ivan Djelic [this message]
2011-04-01 13:04 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 14:04 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 14:16 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 14:49 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 14:58 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-04-01 15:46 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 16:09 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 16:16 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110401121447.GA19151@parrot.com \
--to=ivan.djelic@parrot.com \
--cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
--cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=vipin.kumar@st.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox