public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com>
To: Vipin Kumar <vipin.kumar@st.com>
Cc: "Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com" <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>,
	Viresh KUMAR <viresh.kumar@st.com>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"David.Woodhouse@intel.com" <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Newly erased page read workaround
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 14:14:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110401121447.GA19151@parrot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9595AB.1050604@st.com>

On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:06:51AM +0100, Vipin Kumar wrote:
> That's the problem. Ideally the ecc should have been programmed in OOB and then 
> the driver would be able to correct the flipped bits. The problem happens only 
> if we try to read the erased pages.
> 
> >> Ideally, any filesystem would mark it as a bad block 
> > 
> > That's the point - no. This is normal on modern flashes.
> > 
> > I think one solution could be that you make your check more
> > sophisticated. You check for 0xFFs, if this is not true, you see is this
> > "almost all 0xFFs" and count amount of non-0xFF bits. If the count is,
> > say, 2, you assume this page contains all 0xFFs plus 2 bit-flips. But
> > I'm not sure it would work.
> > 
> > Anyway, If you do not care about such bit-flips for your SoC - fine. I
> > just wanted you to understand and accept the issue and write about it in
> > the comment. And I also wanted you to _not_ do expensive 0xFF comparison
> > every time - but it seems you accepted this :-)
> > 
> 
> Yes, I had to accept this :-)
> The flip side is that the hardware itself should not report errors when it 
> reads all ff data and ff ecc..It should assume it as an erased page and not 
> report any errors
 
Hello Vipin,

Did you consider this idea: if you have an unused byte available in oob,
program it to 0x00 when a page is programmed.

That way, you just need to check a single byte when you read a page in order
to distinguish erased pages from programmed pages. And by counting the number
of 1s in the byte, you can be robust to bitflips.

As a special refinement, you could also "cleanup" pages detected as erased, in
order to iron out possible bitflips.

I think that this method is used by Micron for their internal on-die ecc engine:
they add a parity byte (0x00 or 0x01) to their BCH code, which can be used to:

1) detect failures (using parity) when the max error count is reached
2) distinguish between erased and programmed pages

Best Regards,

Ivan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-01 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-24  6:10 [PATCH] Newly erased page read workaround Viresh Kumar
2011-02-24  9:38 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-24 10:20   ` Vipin Kumar
2011-02-24 11:10     ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-24 11:36       ` Vipin Kumar
2011-03-22  4:36 ` viresh kumar
2011-03-31 13:51 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01  6:28   ` Vipin Kumar
2011-04-01  6:51     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01  8:33       ` Vipin Kumar
2011-04-01  8:39         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01  9:06           ` Vipin Kumar
2011-04-01  9:42             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 12:14             ` Ivan Djelic [this message]
2011-04-01 13:04               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 14:04                 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 14:16                   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 14:49                     ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 14:58                       ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-04-01 15:46                         ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 16:09                     ` Ivan Djelic
2011-04-01 16:16                       ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110401121447.GA19151@parrot.com \
    --to=ivan.djelic@parrot.com \
    --cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
    --cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=vipin.kumar@st.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox