From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wy0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QoNq3-00029N-0B for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 22:53:28 +0000 Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so232806wyf.36 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:53:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 23:53:16 +0100 From: Jamie Iles To: Brian Norris Subject: Re: MTD-related kobject badness during linux-next boot Message-ID: <20110802225316.GF5063@pulham.picochip.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Jamie Iles , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Daniel Drake , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Brian, On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 10:40:29AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > Since Dmitry's change, it looks like cafe_nand will add the master > device, then parse and register its partitions, if found. However, if > partitions are NOT found, then mtd_device_parse_register() falls back > to adding the master device, which was already added. In > drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c, see: > > int mtd_device_parse_register(struct mtd_info *mtd, const char **types, > ... > if (err > 0) { > ... > } else if (err == 0) { > err = add_mtd_device(mtd); > ... > > > So it looks like perhaps we can solve the problem by just killing the > "register the whole device first" and allow mtd_device_parse_register > to do it if there are no partitions. Any cafe_nand developers know if > this is a problem? i.e., is there a reason we need both the whole > device AND the partitions sent to add_mtd_device()? I'll send a full > patch with sign-off and description if there are no objections. I think that's the right thing to do. There's actually a comment in drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c saying: /* NOTE: we don't arrange MTDs as a tree; it'd be error-prone * to have the same data be in two different partitions. */ So I do think it should be the whole device *or* the partitions. In any case, your patch looks good to me. Jamie