From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [85.183.114.52] (helo=Dublin.logfs.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Qx2OK-0005mC-U3 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:48:37 +0000 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:49:10 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: srimugunthan dhandapani Subject: Re: logfs unmount bug Message-ID: <20110826194910.GE22411@logfs.org> References: <20110805160325.GM26160@logfs.org> <20110808083107.GN26160@logfs.org> <20110809145812.GR26160@logfs.org> <20110812093429.GS26160@logfs.org> <20110816171707.GU26160@logfs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 22 August 2011 02:49:14 +0530, srimugunthan dhandapani wrote: > > I had a printk("PATCH1") that gets printed in the log. > I dont know why your "logfs_invalidatepage" debug print does not appear. Are you sure you have my patch applied? Jörn -- Anything that can go wrong, will. -- Finagle's Law