From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [85.183.114.52] (helo=Dublin.logfs.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RIn8S-0004wC-Kq for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:58:09 +0000 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:58:58 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: "Fache, Herve" Subject: Re: [PATCH] phram: make kernel boot command line arguments work Message-ID: <20111025195858.GA10899@logfs.org> References: <1318866038-11781-1-git-send-email-h-fache@ti.com> <1319127421.20953.5.camel@sauron> <1319528259.14178.3.camel@golum> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, joern@lazybastard.org, dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 25 October 2011 11:09:02 +0200, Fache, Herve wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:37, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > Yeah, I thought checkpatch.pl would blame you for improper comments > > style. The standard way to write comments is described in > > Documentation/CodingStyle. > > I have to admit I just re-used the original patch's comments. Do they > need to be changed prior to merging? Nah! Your patch is a clear improvement. If the worst offence of your patch is that you moved code around that had an undesired (but still quite common) comment style, you are in good shape. ;) Jörn -- Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein