From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from antispam01.maxim-ic.com ([205.153.101.182]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RqLMz-0005zC-53 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:11:50 +0000 From: Brian Foster To: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ubinfo: fix `--all' for non-consecutive device numbers Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:53:04 +0100 References: <1327563110-23966-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <1327563110-23966-2-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1327563110-23966-2-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <201201260953.04349.brian.foster@maxim-ic.com> Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Artem Bityutskiy List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 26 January 2012 08:31:50 Brian Norris wrote: > When we have assigned non-consecutive device numbers to our UBI devices [= =2E..] > This patch adds a check to first see if device is present, then continue > to the next ID if it doesn't exist. >[ ... ]=20 Looks Ok to me (when used with part 1). However, looking at the mtd-utils v1.4.6 =E2=80=98mtdinfo.c=E2=80=99, is there a similar issue there? But I have no idea how you could get non-consecutive MTD device numbers? cheers! -blf- =2D-=20 Brian Foster Principal MTS, Software | La Ciotat, France Maxim Integrated Products | Web: http://www.maxim-ic.com/