linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com>
To: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: mtd oob test is failing consistently at same places in NAND flash
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 17:24:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509152437.GA12280@parrot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3E9366EF@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 04:12:05PM +0100, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 00:15:16, Ivan Djelic wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 04:09:46PM +0100, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 18:53:54, Ivan Djelic wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 01:33:06PM +0100, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > We are having an 8-bit NAND part (MT29F2G08ABAEAWP from Micron) 
> > > > > connected to GPMC Module (General purpose memory controller) from TI.
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > How is ecc performed ?
> > > > Using NAND internal ecc ? or with GPMC 1-bit Hamming ? 4-bit/8-bit BCH ?
> > > > Which version of omap2 driver are you using ?
> > > > Is OOB also ECC-protected ?
> > > 
> > > Hardware ECC is performing.
> > > 4-bit BCH ECC scheme is used.
> > > I am using omap2 driver in Linux 3.2.0 Kernel. Don't know omap2 driver version.
> > 
> > You are probably using a patched kernel, since 3.2.0 does not have GPMC BCH support ?!
> > What is your ecc layout ? Does it expose oobfree regions ?
> >
> 
> Yes, we had using patched kernel. OOB free region is exposed.
> 
> ECC layout will be as follows.
> 
> 0-1	-> BAD block marking
> 2-57  -> ECC byte position, ( 14 bytes for 512 byte)
> 58-63 -> oob free bytes
> 
> mtd->ecclayout->eccbytes		= 56
> mtd->ecclayout->eccpos[0]	= 2
> mtd->ecclayout->oobavail		= 6
> mtd->ecclayout->oobfree[0].offset	= 58
> mtd->ecclayout->oobfree[0].length	= 6
> 

OK, then it is quite normal that mtd_oobtest should fail when it encounters a
bitflip (one that does not match the programmed data) in those unprotected 6
bytes (58-63). What do you think ?

BR,
--
Ivan

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-09 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-08 12:33 mtd oob test is failing consistently at same places in NAND flash Philip, Avinash
2012-05-08 13:23 ` Ivan Djelic
2012-05-08 15:09   ` Philip, Avinash
2012-05-08 15:23     ` Philip, Avinash
2012-05-08 18:45     ` Ivan Djelic
2012-05-09 15:12       ` Philip, Avinash
2012-05-09 15:24         ` Ivan Djelic [this message]
2012-05-09 15:46           ` Philip, Avinash
2012-05-09 16:05             ` Ivan Djelic
2012-05-10  7:51             ` Ricard Wanderlof
2012-05-09  6:37     ` Ricard Wanderlof
2012-05-10 13:01 ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120509152437.GA12280@parrot.com \
    --to=ivan.djelic@parrot.com \
    --cc=avinashphilip@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).