From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SdrYx-0002Ii-Lo for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:28:52 +0000 Received: by wibhn14 with SMTP id hn14so2680970wib.0 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:28:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Marek Vasut To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Is there a bug in the UBIFS? Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:28:45 +0200 References: <4FD1BD03.60800@freescale.com> <1339148214.6875.117.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <4FD1CA7C.4040501@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <4FD1CA7C.4040501@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201206110128.45829.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Cc: Huang Shijie , Huang Shijie , dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Dear Huang Shijie, > =E4=BA=8E 2012=E5=B9=B406=E6=9C=8808=E6=97=A5 17:36, Artem Bityutskiy =E5= =86=99=E9=81=93: > > On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 16:51 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > >> [ 3526.960000] UBIFS error (pid 389): ubifs_scan: garbage > >=20 > > UBIFS complains that it read garbage instead of proper UBIFS nodes. > >=20 > >> I am not sure whether it's a UBIFS's bug, or the gpmi-nand's bug. > >=20 > > Does not look like a UBIFS issue. You can always validate UBIFS using > > nandsim. > >=20 > > modprobe nandsim > > modprobe ubi mtd=3D0 > > ubimkvol /dev/ubi0 -N test -m > > mount -t ubifs /dev/ubi0_0 /mnt/ubifs > > integck /mnt/ubifs >=20 > ok, thanks a lot. Did you possibly finally shoot yourself in the leg with this issue that is= =20 constantly ignored? http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2012-January/039127.html >=20 > Huang Shijie Best regards, Marek Vasut