From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mtd: nand: allow NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE to be set from driver
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:20:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207311520.17450.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50178A45.3000406@parrot.com>
Dear Matthieu CASTET,
> Hi,
>
> for ONFI flash (like this micron one) the information should be extracted
> form the ONFI table (programs_per_page IIRC)
>
> This should be better than relying on the SOC driver for setting this
> flags.
>
> Does the gpmi driver set this flag because it do not support partial write
> ?
Yes
> In this case why it doesn't set chip->ecc.steps to 1 ?
Can you elabore how exactly will that help please?
> Matthieu
>
> Brian Norris a écrit :
> > The NAND_CHIPOPTIONS_MSK has limited utility and is causing real bugs. It
> > silently masks off at least one flag that might be set by the driver
> > (NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE). This breaks the GPMI NAND driver and possibly
> > others.
> >
> > Really, as long as driver writers exercise a small amount of care with
> > NAND_* options, this mask is not necessary at all. Thus, kill it.
> >
> >>From Huang Shijie:
> > "I tested this patch on imx6q-arm2 board with Micron MT29F32G08QAA.
> > it works fine, thanks."
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
> > Tested-by: Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> > ---
> > Hello Artem/David,
> >
> > GPMI NAND has needed this patch for some time, and I think it was agreed
> > on by a few. I'm resending to get acknowledgment from a maintainer.
> >
> > drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 7 ++-----
> > include/linux/mtd/nand.h | 3 ---
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > index ead301a..996cc48 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > @@ -2909,8 +2909,6 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct mtd_info
> > *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> >
> > if (le16_to_cpu(p->features) & 1)
> >
> > *busw = NAND_BUSWIDTH_16;
> >
> > - chip->options &= ~NAND_CHIPOPTIONS_MSK;
> > -
> >
> > pr_info("ONFI flash detected\n");
> > return 1;
> >
> > }
> >
> > @@ -3074,9 +3072,8 @@ static struct nand_flash_dev
> > *nand_get_flash_type(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> >
> > mtd->erasesize <<= ((id_data[3] & 0x03) << 1);
> >
> > }
> >
> > }
> >
> > - /* Get chip options, preserve non chip based options */
> > - chip->options &= ~NAND_CHIPOPTIONS_MSK;
> > - chip->options |= type->options & NAND_CHIPOPTIONS_MSK;
> > + /* Get chip options */
> > + chip->options |= type->options;
> >
> > /*
> >
> > * Check if chip is not a Samsung device. Do not clear the
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> > index 6dce5a7..eeb7015 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
> > @@ -206,9 +206,6 @@ typedef enum {
> >
> > #define NAND_SUBPAGE_READ(chip) ((chip->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_SOFT) \
> >
> > && (chip->page_shift > 9))
> >
> > -/* Mask to zero out the chip options, which come from the id table */
> > -#define NAND_CHIPOPTIONS_MSK 0x0000ffff
> > -
> >
> > /* Non chip related options */
> > /* This option skips the bbt scan during initialization. */
> > #define NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN 0x00010000
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-31 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-31 1:02 [PATCH RESEND] mtd: nand: allow NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE to be set from driver Brian Norris
2012-07-31 4:17 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-31 7:33 ` Matthieu CASTET
2012-07-31 13:20 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-07-31 13:28 ` Matthieu CASTET
2012-07-31 13:59 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-31 14:09 ` Matthieu CASTET
2012-07-31 14:12 ` Marek Vasut
2012-07-31 16:11 ` Scott Wood
2012-08-01 2:21 ` Huang Shijie
2012-08-01 13:05 ` Matthieu CASTET
2012-08-01 16:15 ` Scott Wood
2012-08-02 1:08 ` Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201207311520.17450.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthieu.castet@parrot.com \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).