From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from quartz.orcorp.ca ([184.70.90.242]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TNnys-0006U1-Jx for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:57:32 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:57:19 -0600 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] Adjust the NOR CFI flash timeouts to round better Message-ID: <20121015165719.GB32563@obsidianresearch.com> References: <20121005183202.GA11385@obsidianresearch.com> <1350308556.5769.5.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <1350317380.14124.26.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1350317380.14124.26.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:09:40AM -0700, David Woodhouse wrote: > So it's not *entirely* bogus, but it should certainly be cleaned up to > use the msecs_to_jiffies() helpers... or preferably not use jiffies at > all, perhaps. No doubt this is part of why I've seen failures on my boards, the timeout is too short by half and rounded wrong :) A quick grep shows many cases in drivers/mtd that use division of HZ, what would you like to see done here? Jason ?? That's '??s', not 'us', for next time the patch is submitted. Welcome to the 21st century. Hmm.. I may need a new terminal and/or mail reader ;)