From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1TTbPe-00016e-T3 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:45:08 +0000 From: Marek Vasut To: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH for 3.7] mtd: nand: fix Samsung SLC NAND identification regression Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:45:00 +0100 References: <1349850366-4731-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <1349855329.6072.72.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201210311745.00677.marex@denx.de> Cc: Robin van der Gracht , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse , Linux Kernel , Artem Bityutskiy List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Dear Brian Norris, > Hi David, > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:48 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 23:39 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > >> I can see if that's possible, but I think it's unlikely. They don't > >> even bother following standards (ONFI). Is this an obstacle to > >> merging? > > > > No. I already pushed it. > > This is a "bump" for a 3.7-rc pull request. This regression has been > noticed by others. [whine] my nand doesn't work ;-) Thanks for keeping eye on this, Brian. Best regards, Marek Vasut