From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Tfpg2-00079G-Fh for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:24:34 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 11:24:28 +0100 From: Richard Weinberger To: dedekind1@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ubi: Remove PEB from free tree in get_peb_for_wl() Message-ID: <20121204112428.6cbcf330@spider.haslach.nod.at> In-Reply-To: <1354610079.11583.58.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> References: <1354548780.11583.21.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <1354564667-9549-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1354564667-9549-2-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1354610079.11583.58.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, zsadecki@itwatchdogs.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:34:39 +0200 schrieb Artem Bityutskiy : > Looking at all for these 'self_check_in_wl_tree()', I think can kill > most of them and just make 'find_wl_entry()' complain if it did not > find anything. But this is a subject of a separate patch. > Yeah. I've also thought about that. This is material for 3.8-rc0. Thanks, //richard