From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann To: dedekind1@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] mtd: gpmi: move to use generic DMA helper Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:06:18 +0000 References: <1361978748-25281-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1361978748-25281-8-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1362748785.5101.4.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1362748785.5101.4.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201303081406.18597.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Fabio Estevam , Huang Shijie , Vinod Koul , Marek Vasut , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Shawn Guo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 08 March 2013, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 23:25 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > With the generic DMA device tree helper supported by mxs-dma driver, > > client devices only need to call dma_request_slave_channel() for > > requesting a DMA channel from dmaengine. > > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo > > Cc: Artem Bityutskiy > > Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org > > It looks like this ne is rather independent and can go via the MTD tree. > So pushed this one to l2-mtd.git - let me know if I am confused. Thanks! I think you should not apply this patch on a tree that does not already have the first three patches in the series. The easiest way would be to keep the series together. As an alternative, Shawn could create a git branch with those three patches and let you (and the other subsystem maintainers) pull that branch in before applying the subsystem specific patch. Arnd