From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1UJOfg-0003MH-Nu for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:39:45 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id c10so653129wiw.1 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 06:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Florian Fainelli From: Florian Fainelli To: Jonas Gorski Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix NVRAM partition size if larger than expected Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:39:38 +0100 References: <1364044070-10486-1-git-send-email-jogo@openwrt.org> In-Reply-To: <1364044070-10486-1-git-send-email-jogo@openwrt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201303231439.39168.florian@openwrt.org> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Artem Bityutskiy , Kevin Cernekee , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Maxime Bizon , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Le samedi 23 mars 2013 14:07:46, Jonas Gorski a =C3=A9crit : > Some device vendors use a larger nvram size than expected. While Broadcom > has defined it as 64K max, devices with 128K have been seen in the wild. > Luckily they properly set the nvram's PSI size to the correct value, so > we can use that to size the nvram partion. >=20 > Yes it's a bit confusing as there are two nvrams, one with a fixed layout > with in the bootloader, with the size information about the other. >=20 > Since 2 of 3 patches are for the mtd tree, this patchset should go there > (but it applies to both l2-mtd and mips-next fine). Besides the minor nitpicks from patch 2, this serie looks good: Acked-by: Florian Fainelli Thanks! =2D-=20 =46lorian