linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
	richard.weinberger@gmail.com,
	Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2] ubi: Add ubiblock read-write driver
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 21:13:00 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130419001259.GA2259@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201304181630.58886.vapier@gentoo.org>

Hi Mike,

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:30:55PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 December 2012 07:21:52 Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Block device emulation on top of ubi volumes with read/write support.
> > Block devices are created upon user request through the
> > 'vol' module parameter.
> > 
> > For instance,
> > 
> >   $ modprobe ubiblock vol=/dev/ubi0_0
> >   $ modprobe ubiblock vol=0,rootfs
> 
> i played around with ubiblk before finding this newer version.  one thing i 
> think this is missing that ubiblk had is an ioctl interface for adding new 
> block volumes on the fly.  you can attach ubi volumes at runtime, but the only 
> way to attach ubiblocks is by loading/unloading the module, or by rebooting 
> and tweaking the command line.
> 
> imo, that support needs to be re-added.  it'd be great if we could do it via 
> the existing /dev/ubi_ctrl knob, but maybe that'll only work if ubi+ubiblock 
> are built into the kernel, or if ubiblock is merged with ubi ?
>

Yes, such support should be re-added. I'll think about it.

> > Read/write access is expected to work fairly well because the
> > request queue at block elevator orders block transfers to achieve
> > space-locality.
> > In other words, it's expected that reads and writes gets ordered
> > to address the same LEB.
> 
> i wonder if the write support should be put behind a CONFIG option.  
> personally, the write support is kind of neat and semi-useful for development, 
> but i don't plan on shipping anything on that :).  i just want read-only 
> support to load an ext2 fs on top of UBI.
> 

Mmm... good input. Maybe putting write support behind a CONFIG and
showing a big fat warning when the module loads will do?
(something to prevent regular users from using this carelessly).

May I ask why would you want to put ext2 fs? Have you considered f2fs?

> > +static int ubiblock_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
> > +{
> > +	struct ubiblock *dev = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> > +	int ubi_mode = UBI_READONLY;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&dev->vol_mutex);
> > +	if (dev->refcnt > 0) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * The volume is already opened,
> > +		 * just increase the reference counter
> > +		 */
> > +		dev->refcnt++;
> > +		mutex_unlock(&dev->vol_mutex);
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (mode & FMODE_WRITE)
> > +		ubi_mode = UBI_READWRITE;
> 
> hmm, you handle ro vs rw here ...
> 
> > +	ret = ubiblock_alloc_cache(&dev->read_cache, dev->leb_size);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto out_free;
> > +
> > +	ret = ubiblock_alloc_cache(&dev->write_cache, dev->leb_size);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto out_free_cache;
> 
> ... but you always alloc a write cache even when it's mounted ro ?

Good catch.

I'll see if I can cook a v3 one of these days.
-- 
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-19  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-12 12:21 [RFC/PATCH v2] ubi: Add ubiblock read-write driver Ezequiel Garcia
2012-12-12 15:21 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-12-12 15:50   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-12-12 16:14     ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-12-12 16:30       ` Greg KH
2012-12-12 16:32         ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-12-12 16:18   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-12-12 16:35     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-12-12 17:26       ` Michael Opdenacker
2012-12-12 19:50         ` Tim Bird
2013-04-18 20:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-18 20:58   ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-04-19  0:13   ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-04-19  1:28     ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-19  7:10       ` Gupta, Pekon
2013-04-19 11:57         ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-19 12:31           ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-04-19 12:31             ` Bityutskiy, Artem
2013-04-19 12:53             ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-19 12:55               ` Matthieu CASTET
2013-04-24 16:27                 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-19 12:56               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-04-19 15:02             ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-04-19 17:05             ` Tim Bird
2013-04-20 18:12               ` Brian Norris
2013-05-13  7:44               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-04-20  7:50             ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-05-13  7:49               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-05-13  9:23                 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-04-19 12:27       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-05-13  7:28   ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130419001259.GA2259@localhost \
    --to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=elezegarcia@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).