From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
richard.weinberger@gmail.com,
Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2] ubi: Add ubiblock read-write driver
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 21:13:00 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130419001259.GA2259@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201304181630.58886.vapier@gentoo.org>
Hi Mike,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:30:55PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 December 2012 07:21:52 Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Block device emulation on top of ubi volumes with read/write support.
> > Block devices are created upon user request through the
> > 'vol' module parameter.
> >
> > For instance,
> >
> > $ modprobe ubiblock vol=/dev/ubi0_0
> > $ modprobe ubiblock vol=0,rootfs
>
> i played around with ubiblk before finding this newer version. one thing i
> think this is missing that ubiblk had is an ioctl interface for adding new
> block volumes on the fly. you can attach ubi volumes at runtime, but the only
> way to attach ubiblocks is by loading/unloading the module, or by rebooting
> and tweaking the command line.
>
> imo, that support needs to be re-added. it'd be great if we could do it via
> the existing /dev/ubi_ctrl knob, but maybe that'll only work if ubi+ubiblock
> are built into the kernel, or if ubiblock is merged with ubi ?
>
Yes, such support should be re-added. I'll think about it.
> > Read/write access is expected to work fairly well because the
> > request queue at block elevator orders block transfers to achieve
> > space-locality.
> > In other words, it's expected that reads and writes gets ordered
> > to address the same LEB.
>
> i wonder if the write support should be put behind a CONFIG option.
> personally, the write support is kind of neat and semi-useful for development,
> but i don't plan on shipping anything on that :). i just want read-only
> support to load an ext2 fs on top of UBI.
>
Mmm... good input. Maybe putting write support behind a CONFIG and
showing a big fat warning when the module loads will do?
(something to prevent regular users from using this carelessly).
May I ask why would you want to put ext2 fs? Have you considered f2fs?
> > +static int ubiblock_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
> > +{
> > + struct ubiblock *dev = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> > + int ubi_mode = UBI_READONLY;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&dev->vol_mutex);
> > + if (dev->refcnt > 0) {
> > + /*
> > + * The volume is already opened,
> > + * just increase the reference counter
> > + */
> > + dev->refcnt++;
> > + mutex_unlock(&dev->vol_mutex);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (mode & FMODE_WRITE)
> > + ubi_mode = UBI_READWRITE;
>
> hmm, you handle ro vs rw here ...
>
> > + ret = ubiblock_alloc_cache(&dev->read_cache, dev->leb_size);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out_free;
> > +
> > + ret = ubiblock_alloc_cache(&dev->write_cache, dev->leb_size);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out_free_cache;
>
> ... but you always alloc a write cache even when it's mounted ro ?
Good catch.
I'll see if I can cook a v3 one of these days.
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-19 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-12 12:21 [RFC/PATCH v2] ubi: Add ubiblock read-write driver Ezequiel Garcia
2012-12-12 15:21 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-12-12 15:50 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2012-12-12 16:14 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-12-12 16:30 ` Greg KH
2012-12-12 16:32 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-12-12 16:18 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-12-12 16:35 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2012-12-12 17:26 ` Michael Opdenacker
2012-12-12 19:50 ` Tim Bird
2013-04-18 20:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-18 20:58 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-04-19 0:13 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-04-19 1:28 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-19 7:10 ` Gupta, Pekon
2013-04-19 11:57 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-19 12:31 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-04-19 12:31 ` Bityutskiy, Artem
2013-04-19 12:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-19 12:55 ` Matthieu CASTET
2013-04-24 16:27 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-19 12:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-04-19 15:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-04-19 17:05 ` Tim Bird
2013-04-20 18:12 ` Brian Norris
2013-05-13 7:44 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-04-20 7:50 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-05-13 7:49 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-05-13 9:23 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-04-19 12:27 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-05-13 7:28 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130419001259.GA2259@localhost \
--to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=elezegarcia@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).