From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Gupta, Pekon" <pekon@ti.com>
Cc: "Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@ti.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] mtd: omap2: allow bulding as a module
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:34:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304291534.10539.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20980858CB6D3A4BAE95CA194937D5E73E9BCFAE@DBDE04.ent.ti.com>
On Wednesday 24 April 2013, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
> [Pekon]:
> ELM module is required in for Hardware based ECC correction for
> NAND devices. And this driver has a very small foot-print.
>
> The only cases this drives would not be used are:
> (a) Using S/W based ECC scheme, which have vey high CPU utilization
> (b) Using single bit ECC scheme, which are becoming obsolete due to
> increasing NAND densities.
> For most of the cases ELM module will be used with nand-driver. So
> there should be no harm in having this module as built-in, if not used
> in 10% of the use-cases.
>
> Thus I think it's better to keep this module tied to GPMC module,
> rather than independent control via KConfig.
> And user should just selects which ECC scheme he would like to
> use via DT, without worrying about KConfig options.
Sorry, I'm lost here and have no idea what you are actually suggesting
we do. Can you phrase that as a patch?
Unless you come up with a better solution, I would still like to queue
up my patch since it fixes an annoying bug and seems to have no downsides.
> I'm working in cleaning up omap2-nand driver to remove some
> redundancies. So would like to know your feedback on same..
Sure, just Cc me on your patches.
Arnd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-29 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-23 16:30 [PATCH 00/21] ARM build fixes for 3.10 Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-23 16:30 ` [PATCH 21/21] mtd: omap2: allow bulding as a module Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-23 18:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-24 5:34 ` Gupta, Pekon
2013-04-29 13:34 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201304291534.10539.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=afzal@ti.com \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pekon@ti.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox