From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
Cc: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi>,
Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alauda: do not use stack for URB transfer_buffers
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:41:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130821084154.GE31788@brian-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87li3v79uo.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:59:27AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:03:29PM +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
> >> Patch fixes alauda not to use stack as URB transfer_buffer. URB buffers need to
> >> be DMA-able, which stack is not.
> >>
> >> Patch is only compile tested.
> >>
> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mtd/nand/alauda.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > Just FYI, this driver is being removed, so I'm obviously not taking this
> > patch :)
>
> I think you should apply it anyway. The driver is still in v3.11 AFAICS,
> and the patch should also go to the maintained stable kernels. You
> cannot remove the driver from them, and I don't see a later driver
> removal as a valid reason not to fix a known bug with a patch.
Seriously?
The reasons given for removal:
"The driver has very low utility. Devices in question are limited to
about 400kB/s and the only known user (me) discarded the hardware
several years back."
And:
"Maybe we should just remove the driver and not spend any more time on
it?"
So you're suggesting applying an untested (compile-only) fix for an
unobserved bug for the theoretical user of old, slow hardware who wants
to use a recent stable kernel, when the last known user has given up on
the driver entirely?
Anyway, just because you complained, I rebased and applied this to
l2-mtd.git before the driver removal. I'll defer to dwmw2 whether this
patch gets squashed out of existence.
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-21 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-06 12:03 [PATCH] alauda: do not use stack for URB transfer_buffers Jussi Kivilinna
2013-08-06 16:49 ` Jörn Engel
2013-08-07 5:50 ` Jussi Kivilinna
2013-08-07 15:16 ` Jörn Engel
2013-08-21 7:30 ` Brian Norris
2013-08-21 7:59 ` Bjørn Mork
2013-08-21 8:41 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2013-08-21 9:59 ` Jussi Kivilinna
2013-08-21 20:00 ` Brian Norris
2013-08-21 19:06 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130821084154.GE31788@brian-ubuntu \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox