public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
To: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
	haojian.zhuang@gmail.com, b32955@freescale.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2] mtd: nand: pxa3xx: Remove redundant device probing
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:57:30 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130910135729.GA32715@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <522F22C9.1050305@gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:46:49PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 10.09.2013 13:17, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > There's no need to go through this internal probe/auto-detect
> > procedure, since the nand core code will take care of that.
> > This commit removes the configuration and detection functions,
> > together with the built-in flash device table.
> > 
> > Besides being unneeded, it's also wrong to take care of such details
> > wich rightfully belong to the NAND base code. Removing this wrong
> > code, prevents the proliferation of the same mistake in future drivers.
> > 
> > This commit has the effect of forcing the "keep_config" option.
> 
> I get the following build warning with this patch:
> 
>   drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c:221:13: warning:
> ‘pxa3xx_nand_set_timing’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> 

Yes, that's fine. I'm keeping that until we decide what to do with
timings.

> Apart from that, this seems to work fine on my board,

Great! Which board is that?

> but I suspect that
> it would break systems where the NAND controller is not initialized from
> the bootloader, right?
> 

Right. However, since we can easily add support to configure every controller
parameter (right?) this shouldn't be a problem.

What do you think of this change, Daniel?

IMO, the code is ugly, useless and deprecated enough to consider its removal.
It forces to keep a (duplicated) list of known flash devices and it considers
only 512 and 2048 page sizes, just to name a few limitations.

But I'd love to hear a second opinion.
-- 
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-10 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-10 11:17 [RFC/PATCH v2] pxa3xx-nand: Remove custom device detection Ezequiel Garcia
2013-09-10 11:17 ` [RFC/PATCH v2] mtd: nand: pxa3xx: Remove redundant device probing Ezequiel Garcia
2013-09-10 13:46   ` Daniel Mack
2013-09-10 13:57     ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-09-10 14:14       ` Daniel Mack
2013-09-10 14:21         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-09-24 21:46         ` Setting NAND timings parameters (Re: [RFC/PATCH v2] mtd: nand: pxa3xx: Remove redundant device probing) Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-26 23:17           ` Brian Norris
2013-11-27 11:38             ` Ezequiel Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130910135729.GA32715@localhost \
    --to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=alior@marvell.com \
    --cc=b32955@freescale.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=zonque@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox