From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, "arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"dedekind1@gmail.com" <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
"avinashphilipk@gmail.com" <avinashphilipk@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@ti.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"Gupta, Pekon" <pekon@ti.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
"benoit.cousson@linaro.org" <benoit.cousson@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] ARM: OMAP2+: cleaned-up DT support of various ECC schemes
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:29:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130925212903.GI23337@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMif301iBe9zxHudkC_G9SzPPy1Mj4XYvQ-MY8nmx4wO+A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:33:27PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Brian Norris
> <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Olof has given good advice on your DT binding and has (slowly) been
> > responding to other requests for DT review that make it to his list. I
> > see that he hasn't followed up on your changes (this v6), so pinging him
> > (as you did) is probably the correct approach. But please do recognize
> > that the DT list is very high volume, so it's hard to get good timely
> > responses there.
>
> I am not a DT mainainer, but sometimes when I see a binding that
> appears to be wrong I speak up. In this case, the binding was one of
> those.
Whoops, my bad. I was deceived by the responses I've seen from you on
other issues (thanks, BTW). In that case, I haven't seen any response
from a proper DT binding maintainer :(
> So, I have no more objections to it, and I hope you can get a quick
> review from a DT maintainer on the rest of the binding.
At this point, I'm comfortable going ahead without their ack, since they
obviously don't care/don't have the manpower to review.
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-12 11:50 [PATCH v6 0/4] mtd:nand:omap2: clean-up of supported ECC schemes Pekon Gupta
2013-09-12 11:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] ARM: OMAP2+: cleaned-up DT support of various " Pekon Gupta
2013-09-24 18:04 ` Gupta, Pekon
2013-09-25 13:46 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-09-25 17:46 ` Brian Norris
2013-09-25 17:55 ` Brian Norris
2013-09-25 19:24 ` Gupta, Pekon
2013-09-25 20:05 ` Brian Norris
2013-09-25 20:33 ` Olof Johansson
2013-09-25 21:29 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2013-09-25 21:32 ` Olof Johansson
2013-09-25 22:22 ` Brian Norris
2013-09-26 9:18 ` Mark Rutland
2013-09-26 9:32 ` Gupta, Pekon
2013-09-26 6:15 ` Gupta, Pekon
2013-09-25 18:29 ` Brian Norris
2013-09-25 22:23 ` Rob Herring
2013-09-26 6:08 ` Gupta, Pekon
2013-09-26 10:54 ` Gupta, Pekon
2013-09-26 17:09 ` Mark Rutland
2013-09-27 6:17 ` Gupta, Pekon
2013-09-26 17:27 ` Brian Norris
2013-09-12 11:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] mtd:nand:omap2: clean-up BCHx_HW and BCHx_SW ECC configurations in device_probe Pekon Gupta
2013-09-25 18:42 ` Brian Norris
2013-09-25 19:02 ` Brian Norris
2013-09-12 11:50 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] mtd:nand:omap2: updated support for BCH4 ECC scheme Pekon Gupta
2013-09-25 19:13 ` Brian Norris
2013-09-12 11:50 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] ARM: dts: AM33xx: updated default ECC scheme in nand-ecc-opt Pekon Gupta
2013-09-25 19:15 ` Brian Norris
2013-09-26 11:28 ` Gupta, Pekon
2013-09-26 13:26 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-09-26 10:58 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] mtd:nand:omap2: clean-up of supported ECC schemes Gupta, Pekon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130925212903.GI23337@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=avinashphilipk@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=benoit.cousson@linaro.org \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=pekon@ti.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox