From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VOweI-0007Yc-EL for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 21:29:32 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id gq1so584223obb.12 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:29:03 -0700 From: Brian Norris To: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] ARM: OMAP2+: cleaned-up DT support of various ECC schemes Message-ID: <20130925212903.GI23337@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> References: <1378986619-26765-1-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com> <1378986619-26765-2-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com> <20980858CB6D3A4BAE95CA194937D5E73EA15ED7@DBDE04.ent.ti.com> <20130925134619.GG10746@radagast> <20130925175527.GA23337@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> <20980858CB6D3A4BAE95CA194937D5E73EA16884@DBDE04.ent.ti.com> <20130925200539.GH23337@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Pawel Moll , "arnd@arndb.de" , "dedekind1@gmail.com" , "tony@atomide.com" , Rob Herring , Ian Campbell , "avinashphilipk@gmail.com" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Balbi, Felipe" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "Gupta, Pekon" , Stephen Warren , "benoit.cousson@linaro.org" , Andrew Morton , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:33:27PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Brian Norris > wrote: > > > Olof has given good advice on your DT binding and has (slowly) been > > responding to other requests for DT review that make it to his list. I > > see that he hasn't followed up on your changes (this v6), so pinging him > > (as you did) is probably the correct approach. But please do recognize > > that the DT list is very high volume, so it's hard to get good timely > > responses there. > > I am not a DT mainainer, but sometimes when I see a binding that > appears to be wrong I speak up. In this case, the binding was one of > those. Whoops, my bad. I was deceived by the responses I've seen from you on other issues (thanks, BTW). In that case, I haven't seen any response from a proper DT binding maintainer :( > So, I have no more objections to it, and I hope you can get a quick > review from a DT maintainer on the rest of the binding. At this point, I'm comfortable going ahead without their ack, since they obviously don't care/don't have the manpower to review. Brian