From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:50:49 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Ezequiel Garcia Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/27] Armada 370/XP NAND support Message-ID: <20131020195049.7e683d0f@skate> In-Reply-To: <20131019162158.GA3044@localhost> References: <1382137374-21251-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> <20131019063535.GC20157@1wt.eu> <20131019142549.GO22434@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20131019162158.GA3044@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Lior Amsalem , Jason Cooper , Tawfik Bayouk , Daniel Mack , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Gregory Clement , Brian Norris , Willy Tarreau , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Dear Ezequiel Garcia, On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 13:21:59 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > > I strongly believe that all the information above is very valuable and > > > that it's a shame to lose it in a cover message. It would definitely > > > make sense to have this in a doc file. > > > > Agreed. Great work Ezequiel! Let's capture this in Documentation/. > > > > Wait a second! > > $ ls Documentation/mtd/ | wc -l > 1 > > Isn't documenting deprecated? ... > > Just kiddin'! I'll add this and the other cover to Documentation/ > so typos and english fixes are welcome! I certainly agree this documentation should be kept, but I'm wondering if keeping it as a comment inside the driver doesn't make more sense. This document is really more about specific implementation details, and the next person looking at the driver is not very likely to search such details in Documentation/, in my opinion. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com