From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
Cc: computersforpeace@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
balbi@ti.com, dedekind1@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: mtd: m25p80: Add quad read support.
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:45:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201310271745.17152.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382693145-15750-1-git-send-email-sourav.poddar@ti.com>
Dear Sourav Poddar,
[...]
> +static int macronix_quad_enable(struct m25p *flash)
> +{
> + int ret, val;
> + u8 cmd[2];
> + cmd[0] = OPCODE_WRSR;
> +
> + val = read_sr(flash);
> + cmd[1] = val | SR_QUAD_EN_MX;
> + write_enable(flash);
> +
> + spi_write(flash->spi, &cmd, 2);
> +
> + if (wait_till_ready(flash))
> + return 1;
> +
> + ret = read_sr(flash);
Maybe read_sr() and read_cr() shall be fixed to return retval only and the val
shall be passed to them as an argument pointer? Aka. ret = read_sr(flash, &val);
That way, this dangerous construct below could become:
if (!(val & SR_....)) {
dev_err();
ret = -EINVAL;
}
return ret;
It will also let us prevent mixing of error codes and register values, which is
pretty ugly practice.
> + if (!(ret > 0 && (ret & SR_QUAD_EN_MX))) {
> + dev_err(&flash->spi->dev,
> + "Macronix Quad bit not set");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
[...]
> +static inline int set_quad_mode(struct m25p *flash, u32 jedec_id)
> +{
> + int status;
> +
> + switch (JEDEC_MFR(jedec_id)) {
> + case CFI_MFR_MACRONIX:
> + status = macronix_quad_enable(flash);
> + if (status) {
> + dev_err(&flash->spi->dev,
> + "Macronix quad not enable");
"Macronix quad-read not enabled" would be more sensible, DTTO below.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return status;
> + default:
> + status = spansion_quad_enable(flash);
> + if (status) {
> + dev_err(&flash->spi->dev,
> + "Spansion quad not enable");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return status;
> + }
> +}
[...]
> @@ -774,7 +906,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_ids[] = {
> { "mx25l12855e", INFO(0xc22618, 0, 64 * 1024, 256, 0) },
> { "mx25l25635e", INFO(0xc22019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, 0) },
> { "mx25l25655e", INFO(0xc22619, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, 0) },
> - { "mx66l51235l", INFO(0xc2201a, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024, 0) },
> + { "mx66l51235l", INFO(0xc2201a, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024, M25P80_QUAD_READ) },
I'm not convinced enabling 4-bit mode should be hard-coded in the MTD driver.
There might be a board which uses this chip in 1-bit mode.
We have a setup with Spansion chip here which uses 1-bit addressing in U-Boot,
but uses 4-bit addressing in Linux. We use a DT property to configure the SPI
bus width for that and I think that's a way to go. Note that there also are
chips which use 2-bit wide SPI communication.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-27 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-25 9:25 [PATCH] drivers: mtd: m25p80: Add quad read support Sourav Poddar
2013-10-25 10:18 ` Huang Shijie
2013-10-25 10:19 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-10-27 16:45 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-10-27 18:26 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-10-27 18:30 ` Marek Vasut
2013-10-27 18:37 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-10-27 18:47 ` Marek Vasut
2013-10-29 5:57 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-10-29 14:01 ` Marek Vasut
2013-10-29 14:08 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-10-29 15:27 ` Marek Vasut
2013-10-29 16:52 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-10-29 17:08 ` Marek Vasut
2013-10-29 17:12 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-10-29 18:24 ` Marek Vasut
2013-10-29 18:34 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-10-30 6:27 ` Huang Shijie
2013-10-30 6:46 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-10-30 6:54 ` Huang Shijie
2013-10-30 10:11 ` Marek Vasut
2013-11-12 18:13 ` Brian Norris
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-24 12:10 Sourav Poddar
2013-09-25 3:06 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-25 5:20 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-09-25 5:48 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-25 5:51 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-09-25 5:54 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-09-25 5:56 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-25 6:16 ` Huang Shijie
2013-09-25 6:24 ` Sourav Poddar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201310271745.17152.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sourav.poddar@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).