From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 09:24:35 +0100
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 25/28] ARM: mvebu: Add support for NAND controller in
 Armada 370/XP
Message-ID: <20131106092435.5f95aa55@skate>
In-Reply-To: <20131105151531.GK3060@titan.lakedaemon.net>
References: <1383656135-8627-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
 <1383656135-8627-26-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
 <20131105132905.GJ3060@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <20131105135145.GA2676@localhost>
 <20131105151531.GK3060@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>, Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
 Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>, Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>,
 linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
 Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
 Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
 Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

Dear Jason Cooper,

On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:15:31 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:

> > And I'd rather do that in a separate patch, to avoid cluttering the poor
> > devicetree people with an unrelated 28-piece patch :-)
> 
> No (really), according to Grant and Mark during the closing session, I
> asked this specific question.  They _do_ want the entire series so they
> can refer to the corresponding code changes if necessary.  As I stated
> above, we can make their job easier by making the binding a separate
> patch that is clearly marked as such.

Interesting, because I had understood exactly the opposite from the
discussions at the ARM kernel summit. But maybe the DT folks changed
their mind between the ARM kernel summit and the closing session of the
kernel summit :-)

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com