From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: angus.clark@st.com, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Supply all register address and bit logic defines
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:32:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131118173201.GP13640@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131118172243.GO2674@sirena.org.uk>
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 04:02:26PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Like I say I'm suggesting that the bit of the code that understands the
> > > flash chip is separate to the bit of code that knows the mechanics of
> > > sending commands and data to the chip.
>
> > The issue is that almost the entire driver is controller side. The
> > only bits that are the same (and not in all cases) are the OPCODEs,
> > but they are one liners (21 lines out of 1153). Most of the
> > controllers which use this stuff could reuse quite a bit of the m25p80
> > driver as they just write the message containing the OPCODE as the
> > m25p80 driver sets it up, but that's simply not the case with our
> > controller. We would have to pull the OPCODE out and based on which
> > one it is, we'd have to build our own message.
>
> OK, so then perhaps the abstraction here is simply to export the table
> with the opcodes from the m25p80 driver so that when someone comes along
> and adds a new chip they can just add it there and other drivers will
> get the update too.
We could do that, although I'd have to insist on extending the current
framework to add a configuration call-back, as it's the neatest way to
configure chip specific attributes.
I can get a patch out tomorrow if the MTD guys agree. Where are they
by the way? I haven't seen hide nor hair of them since sending out the
patch set.
> > Put it this way, if we tried to use the m25p80 our controller driver
> > would most likely be twice as large and twice as complex as it is
> > currently, which is exactly the inverse of what we're trying to
> > achieve here.
>
> If we're having to add new flashes to multiple drivers I'd not say we're
> winning.
I agree.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-18 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-14 14:22 [PATCH 00/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Add new device Lee Jones
2013-11-14 14:22 ` [PATCH 01/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Allocate resources and register with MTD framework Lee Jones
2013-11-14 14:22 ` [PATCH 02/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Supply all register address and bit logic defines Lee Jones
2013-11-18 9:15 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-18 9:32 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-18 13:39 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-18 14:24 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-18 14:45 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-18 14:56 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-18 15:16 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-18 15:31 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-18 15:41 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-18 16:02 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-18 17:22 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-18 17:32 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2013-11-18 17:59 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-11-18 18:35 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-14 14:22 ` [PATCH 03/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Initialise and configure the FSM for normal working conditions Lee Jones
2013-11-14 14:22 ` [PATCH 04/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Supply framework for device requests Lee Jones
2013-11-14 14:22 ` [PATCH 05/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Supply a method to read from the FSM's FIFO Lee Jones
2013-11-14 14:22 ` [PATCH 06/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Supply defines for the possible flash command opcodes Lee Jones
2013-11-14 14:22 ` [PATCH 07/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Add support for JEDEC ID extraction Lee Jones
2013-11-14 14:22 ` [PATCH 08/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Provide device look-up table Lee Jones
2013-11-14 14:22 ` [PATCH 09/10] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Dynamically setup flash device based on JEDEC ID Lee Jones
2013-11-14 14:22 ` [PATCH 10/10] ARM: STi: Add support for the FSM Serial Flash Controller Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131118173201.GP13640@lee--X1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=angus.clark@st.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox