From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut To: Huang Shijie Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mtd: spi-nor: add a new framework for SPI NOR Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:27:06 +0100 References: <1385447575-23773-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <1385447575-23773-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201311271027.06982.marex@denx.de> Cc: broonie@linaro.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, pekon@ti.com, sourav.poddar@ti.com, computersforpeace@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Dear Huang Shijie, > 1.) Why add a new framework for SPI NOR? > The SPI-NOR controller such as Freescale's Quadspi controller is working > in a different way from the SPI bus. It should knows the NOR commands to > find the right LUT sequence. Unfortunately, the current code can not meet > this requirement. Is there any kind of documentation for this controller available? I cannot quite understand how this controller works and why can it not be used with our current infrastructure. Best regards, Marek Vasut