From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut To: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mtd: spi-nor: add a new framework for SPI NOR Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 00:41:15 +0100 References: <1385447575-23773-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <1386084180.18201.67.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20131203182808.GD9468@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <20131203182808.GD9468@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201312040041.15823.marex@denx.de> Cc: broonie@linaro.org, Huang Shijie , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, pekon@ti.com, Sourav Poddar , David Woodhouse , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday, December 03, 2013 at 07:28:08 PM, Brian Norris wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:23:00PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Seriously, guys, can you please trim your citations? Include only what's > > absolutely needed for what you're saying right now! > > +1 > > Additionally, when trimming replies, can you please leave a proper Sorry, I was so into the discussion I was carried away. I humbly apologize for my misstep. > On , wrote: > > line before the quote? It helps to identify who said what in a quote, > and it serves a much better purpose than leaving the 'Dear So-and-so' > intact. Yeah, I was thinking about changing this for a while now. > Seeing the following tells me who you were speaking to, not who was > > actually speaking: > > > Dear Sourav Poddar, > > > > > > > Dear Marek Vasut, > > Particularly, it seems like Marek's and Huang's mailers tend to leave > the attribution line off. Fixed now I hope. Best regards, Marek Vasut