From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9]
 helo=mail.free-electrons.com)
 by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1WCzUc-0000e8-41
 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:38:22 +0000
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:37:54 +0100
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ubi: Introduce block devices for UBI volumes
Message-ID: <20140210233754.71e3e199@skate>
In-Reply-To: <20140210184858.GA6484@localhost>
References: <52F6BCCD.5070302@nod.at> <20140208233758.GH22376@1wt.eu>
 <52F6C916.2030506@nod.at> <20140209075157.GJ22376@1wt.eu>
 <20140210024827.GB9643@localhost>
 <1392017750.31031.8.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
 <20140210082714.GB10872@localhost> <20140210084616.GP22376@1wt.eu>
 <20140210142026.GB15607@localhost>
 <1392043814.32363.49.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
 <20140210184858.GA6484@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
 "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
 Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>,
 Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com>,
 Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

Dear Ezequiel Garcia,

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:48:59 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:

> Hm... well, this brings another question. The 1-LEB cache was made
> optional after a suggestion from Piergiorgio; the reason for not
> enabling the cache is to make the block interface even less memory
> hungry.

Can you make this runtime configurable using a module parameter?

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com