From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9] helo=mail.free-electrons.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WCzr3-0001Aw-2W for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:01:35 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:01:09 +0100 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Piergiorgio Beruto Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ubi: Introduce block devices for UBI volumes Message-ID: <20140211000109.36724c26@skate> In-Reply-To: References: <52F6BCCD.5070302@nod.at> <20140208233758.GH22376@1wt.eu> <52F6C916.2030506@nod.at> <20140209075157.GJ22376@1wt.eu> <20140210024827.GB9643@localhost> <1392017750.31031.8.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20140210082714.GB10872@localhost> <20140210084616.GP22376@1wt.eu> <20140210142026.GB15607@localhost> <1392043814.32363.49.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20140210184858.GA6484@localhost> <20140210233754.71e3e199@skate> <20140210234600.3a03b346@skate> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mike Frysinger , Artem Bityutskiy , Richard Weinberger , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Ezequiel Garcia , Michael Opdenacker , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , Willy Tarreau List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Dear Piergiorgio Beruto, (Please wrap your e-mail at ~72 characters per line, as is coming practice in the open-source community) On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:49:38 +0100, Piergiorgio Beruto wrote: > Sorry, i understand, just i dont see the point in using a runtime var when the compile time option is already implemented and in my personal opinion is preferable. That's probably because you don't understand the additional maintenance burden caused by compile time option. When there are gazillions of compile time options, there are gazillions of build possibilities that a maintainer must test when applying patches, and pushing changes upstream. This is annoying and can be avoided by limiting the number of compile time parameters. Of course, it's completely a matter of trade-off: we still do want to have compile-time options for complete drivers, but we generally try to avoid them to tune the driver behavior itself. That being said, I can't speak for the UBI maintainer :-) Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com