From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9] helo=mail.free-electrons.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WDDtv-0003p0-DZ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:01:28 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:01:03 -0300 From: Ezequiel Garcia To: Boris BREZILLON Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: add per NAND partition ECC config Message-ID: <20140211140102.GB23150@localhost> References: <1391855206-5974-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1391855206-5974-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Maxime Ripard , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Boris, On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 11:26:46AM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > This patch aims to add per partition ECC config for NAND devices. > It defines a new field in the mtd struct to store the mtd ECC config and > thus each mtd partition device can store its config instead of using the > default NAND chip config. > > This feature is needed to support the sunxi boot0 paritition case: > Allwinner boot code (BROM) requires a specific HW ECC for its boot code > that may not fit the HW NAND requirements for the entire NAND chip. > > Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON > --- > Hello, > > This patch is just a draft that implement per partition ECC config. > It's currently not properly splitted (it should be separated in several > patches) and not documented either. > Ah, ah... > There's at least one point that bother me in the current implementation: > I introduced DT notions in the nand core code by the mean of the get_ecc_ctrl > callback, and so far this was kept out of mtd/nand core code (I guess it was > on purpose). > > Please let me know if you see other drawbacks. > > If you think per partition ECC should not be implemented, could you help me > find a way to handle sunxi specific case decribed above ? > > drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 23 ++- > drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 428 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- I really appreciate your effort, but 428 changed lines is a too big and intrusive change. I must admit I'm not smart enough to review such patches. I honestly think you'll have better luck getting feedback if you take the time to properly split and document this. Yeah, it's annoying and time-consuming, but it's globally cheaper for you to invest time on making it easier for reviewers and maintainers, than for each of us to invest the time deciphering this :-) Just my point of view, of course. -- Ezequiel GarcĂ­a, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com