From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9] helo=mail.free-electrons.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WKmsC-0007Z0-Go for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:46:57 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 07:46:25 -0300 From: Ezequiel Garcia To: Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: block: do not use term "attach" Message-ID: <20140304104624.GD28411@localhost> References: <1393927373-1472-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1393927373-1472-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> Cc: MTD Maling List List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:02:53PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > From: Artem Bityutskiy > > We already use term attach/detach for UBI->MTD relations, let's not use this > for UBI->ubiblock relations to avoid confusion. Just use 'create' and 'delete' s/delete/remove > instead. E.g., "create a R/O block device on top of a UBI volume". > > Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy > --- > drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > Change looks good, except I'd like to change ubiblock_add/ubiblock_del with ubiblock_create/ubiblock_remove for consistency. I haven't been too consistent with this terms and it's a good time to fix it. Want me to prepare a patch? -- Ezequiel GarcĂ­a, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com