From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
To: Pekon Gupta <pekon@ti.com>
Cc: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>,
avinashphilipk@gmail.com,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] mtd: devices: elm: configure parallel channels based on ecc_steps
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:08:01 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140310140801.GE5994@arch.cereza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394197344-9468-4-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com>
On Mar 07, Pekon Gupta wrote:
> Though ELM hardware can process upto maximum of 8 channels in parallel for
> ECC error detection. But actual number of channels need to be processed in
> parallel depends on ecc_steps (for page mode configuration).
>
This commit log needs some love ;) How about something along these lines:
"ELM hardware can process up to ERR_VECTOR_MAX channels in parallel for
ECC error detection. However, the actual number of channels that need to
be processed is the ECC step number." ?
Perhaps you could add some more information (I'm not too familiar with ELM),
what's the impact of this change? Does it fix any bug or the over-looping
was harmless?
> Signed-off-by: Pekon Gupta <pekon@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/devices/elm.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/elm.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/elm.c
> index f59c100..43fd81d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/elm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/elm.c
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void elm_load_syndrome(struct elm_info *info,
> int i, offset;
> u32 val;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ERROR_VECTOR_MAX; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < info->ecc_steps; i++) {
I think it would be less confusing if you can add the ecc_steps field on this
patch, where you start to use it.
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-10 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-07 13:02 [PATCH v6 0/4] mtd: devices: elm: add checks ELM H/W constrains, driver code cleanup Pekon Gupta
2014-03-07 13:02 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] mtd: devices: elm: check for hardware engine's design constrains Pekon Gupta
2014-03-10 13:35 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-03-12 11:08 ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-03-07 13:02 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] mtd: devices: elm: clean elm_load_syndrome Pekon Gupta
2014-03-07 13:02 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] mtd: devices: elm: configure parallel channels based on ecc_steps Pekon Gupta
2014-03-10 14:08 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2014-03-07 13:02 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] mtd: devices: elm: update DRIVER_NAME as "omap-elm" Pekon Gupta
2014-03-10 13:59 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-03-11 10:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] mtd: devices: elm: add checks ELM H/W constrains, driver code cleanup Lee Jones
2014-03-11 10:18 ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-03-11 11:47 ` Lee Jones
2014-03-11 11:57 ` Gupta, Pekon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140310140801.GE5994@arch.cereza \
--to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=avinashphilipk@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pekon@ti.com \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox