From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:45:13 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH v2 08/14] mtd: nand: add sunxi NAND
 flash controller support
Message-ID: <20140311184513.GC31835@obsidianresearch.com>
References: <1391006064-28890-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com>
 <1391006064-28890-9-git-send-email-b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com>
 <20140129175641.GF1427@obsidianresearch.com>
 <20140129184619.GC27143@localhost>
 <20140129191005.GG1427@obsidianresearch.com>
 <531D9F4B.6040505@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <531D9F4B.6040505@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
 Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
 linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, dev@linux-sunxi.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
 Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
 Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
 Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:17:31PM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> Hello Jason,
> 
> Le 29/01/2014 20:10, Jason Gunthorpe a écrit :
> >On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:46:20PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> >
> >>After CE# has been pulled high and then transitioned low again, the host
> >>should issue a Set Features to select the appropriate asynchronous timing mode.
> >>"""
> >Oh, I had forgot you should do a set feature too
> >
> >Boris, I think the core core should handle this dance and the driver
> >should just implement a call back to change the timing mode on the
> >interface..
> >
> >If I ever get a moment I can work on support for timing setting in the
> >mvebu driver, I have boards here with ONFI NAND..
> 
> Any progress on this ?
> I'm about to post the 3rd version of this series and if you already have
> something working I could base my work on your proposal.

Sorry, no, I will try to look over your v3 though.

Regards,
Jason