From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9]
 helo=mail.free-electrons.com)
 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
 id 1WZiJu-0001lF-LP
 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:57:15 +0000
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:56:22 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
To: Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@sequanux.org>,
 Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Allow to specify an ECC scheme through DT
Message-ID: <20140414145622.GA9294@arch>
References: <1395401690-25221-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
 <20140401100417.GI27979@kw.sim.vm.gnt>
 <20140403151941.GA21114@arch.cereza>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20140403151941.GA21114@arch.cereza>
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
 Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>, Seif Mazareeb <seif@marvell.com>,
 Simon Guinot <sguinot@lacie.com>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
 Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
 <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

On Apr 03, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Apr 01, Simon Guinot wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 08:34:46AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > Now that we have agreed on the ECC devicetree binding, here's a patchset
> > > that makes pxa3xx-nand driver use it.
> > > 
> > > This work is required on platforms where the flash device reports a required
> > > ECC strength, but that are capable of handling a stronger one. Simon Guinot
> > > reported a situation where the vendor provided a bootloader configured with
> > > a stronger than required ECC scheme. Without this patches, such a situation
> > > would require a hack to make the driver use a specific ECC scheme.
> > > 
> > > (Simon: it would be great if you can confirm this allows you to remove any hacks).
> > 
> > Hi Ezequiel,
> > 
> > I confirm this allows me to configure the ECC strength and step size
> > from DT.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@sequanux.org>
> > 
> 
> Thanks a lot for the test.
> 
> Brian, any comments?

Any chance this can be applied?
-- 
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com