From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@intel.com>
Cc: angus.clark@st.com,
Christophe KERELLO <christophe.kerello@st.com>,
Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: read 6 bytes for the ID
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 09:14:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201408050914.11864.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140805005200.GA19643@shldeISGChi005.sh.intel.com>
On Tuesday, August 05, 2014 at 02:52:00 AM, Huang Shijie wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:24:07PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > The logic here is just plain convoluted, because we haven't updated the
> > flash_info struct to contain the ID length. Please fix this. Just like
> > struct nand_flash_dev, we probably need an 'id_len' field. Bonus points
> > if you can extend the structure properly without having to modify the
> > entire existing table... Maybe a new INFO6() macro? (Better name
> > suggestions are welcome.)
>
> ok. I will try to add a "id_len" field in the next patch.
>
> > Another reason for adding this field: what if we need to match to a
> > 6-byte ID where the 6th byte is 0x00? I already see a 5-byte ID in our
> > table where the 5th byte is 0x00.
>
> I think it is okay if the 6the byte is 0x00.
> Anyway, we do not meet such NOR. If we meet such NOR in future, we
> can check it carefully, and see if we need to change the code a little.
Well, I expressed my disagreement on that matter a few times already. Like Brian
mentioned, adding an id_len field would be the way to go. It would prevent all
kinds of crazy wrap-arounds when reading the IDs and other such strange
behavior.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-05 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-14 10:09 [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: read 6 bytes for the ID Huang Shijie
2014-04-14 11:53 ` Marek Vasut
2014-04-14 14:44 ` Huang Shijie
2014-04-14 18:23 ` Marek Vasut
2014-04-15 5:22 ` Huang Shijie
2014-04-15 13:35 ` Marek Vasut
2014-04-15 16:04 ` Huang Shijie
2014-04-15 18:48 ` Marek Vasut
2014-04-16 1:52 ` Huang Shijie
2014-04-16 10:18 ` Marek Vasut
2014-04-16 13:56 ` Huang Shijie
2014-04-16 23:23 ` Marek Vasut
2014-04-17 4:55 ` Huang Shijie
2014-04-22 8:19 ` Huang Shijie
2014-05-27 1:12 ` Huang Shijie
2014-05-27 15:57 ` Christophe KERELLO
2014-05-28 5:22 ` Huang Shijie
2014-05-28 16:27 ` Christophe KERELLO
2014-05-29 20:58 ` Marek Vasut
2014-05-30 0:49 ` Huang Shijie
2014-06-03 14:23 ` Marek Vasut
2014-08-04 23:24 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-05 0:52 ` Huang Shijie
2014-08-05 7:14 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2014-08-06 0:23 ` Huang Shijie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201408050914.11864.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=angus.clark@st.com \
--cc=b32955@freescale.com \
--cc=christophe.kerello@st.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shijie.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).