From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
To: pekon <pekon@pek-sem.com>
Cc: "Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Guido Martínez" <guido@vanguardiasur.com.ar>,
"Roger Quadros" <rogerq@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nand: omap2: Remove horrible ifdefs to fix module probe
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 12:16:56 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140907151656.GA1048@arch.cereza> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540C26F7.7020005@pek-sem.com>
On 07 Sep 03:05 PM, pekon wrote:
[..]
> As ECC-scheme is selected in GPMC driver based on DTS settings, so
> any mis-match is easily handled there.
> Moreover, error will occur when we change ECC-scheme on-the-fly,
> which is still not supported by framework, and require many other
> updates if we plan to support that in near future.
> So considering ECC-scheme as static configuration is a safe assumption.
>
> But surely you can drop new check in omap2_nand_ecc_check(), which
> is already covered in @@gpmc_probe_nand_child(...)
>
> However, I leave it to you and rogerq@ti.com (as he currently
> maintains OMAP NAND driver from TI side) to decide how to go about it.
>
As far as I can see, your proposal only cover the devicetree-probed case
and it won't work for legacy boards.
Given it seems we still support legacy, I'd say your proposal would break
things.
Not to mention that I still prefer to fail at probe time if the driver cannot
deal with the selected ECC, and that's exactly what omap2_nand_ecc_check()
does.
--
Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-07 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-06 19:56 [PATCH 0/3] nand: omap2: Two and a half improvements Ezequiel Garcia
2014-09-06 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] nand: omap2: Add support for a flash-based bad block table Ezequiel Garcia
2014-09-06 19:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] nand: omap2: Remove horrible ifdefs to fix module probe Ezequiel Garcia
2014-09-06 21:10 ` pekon
2014-09-06 21:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-09-06 23:17 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-09-07 9:35 ` pekon
2014-09-07 15:16 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2014-09-08 8:45 ` Roger Quadros
2014-09-08 10:53 ` Roger Quadros
2014-09-10 12:48 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-09-10 13:05 ` Roger Quadros
2014-09-17 8:33 ` Brian Norris
2014-09-17 9:54 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-09-18 2:54 ` Brian Norris
2014-09-10 20:15 ` pekon
2014-09-08 11:28 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-09-06 19:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] nand: omap2: Replace pr_err with dev_err Ezequiel Garcia
2014-09-08 8:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] nand: omap2: Two and a half improvements Roger Quadros
2014-09-08 11:31 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-09-08 11:47 ` Roger Quadros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140907151656.GA1048@arch.cereza \
--to=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=guido@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekon@pek-sem.com \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox