From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, zajec5@gmail.com,
Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mtd: spi-nor: factor out write_enable() for erase commands
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:25:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140910232526.GI18411@ld-irv-0074> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140910161237.GB13736@shldeISGChi005.sh.intel.com>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:12:37AM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:47:08AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:20:21PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:05:37AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 08:59:12AM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > > you miss a write_enable for each sector's erase.
> >
> > But is that necessary? I thought 'write-enabled' was retained across
> > operations, so why would you have to perform it before each sector's
> > erase?
> The legacy code did so.
>
> >
> > Or do you have a flash datasheet which says you must send WREN before
> > each sector erase?
> See the belowing from Spansion Nor S25fl129:
>
> "
> The Sector Erase (SE) command sets all bits at all addresses within a
> specified sector to a logic 1. A WREN
> command is required prior to writing the SE command.
> "
>
> It does not tell we send a WREN for each sector erase, but i am not sure if we can remove it.
OK, well I guess I can rework this to retain the original behavior. That
was in fact, an oversight (thanks for catching), although I'm not
convinced it's actually necessary.
(Edit: I think you may be right that WREN is necessary before every
erased command. From a Micron N25Q256 datasheet:
The write enable latch bit must be set before every PROGRAM, ERASE,
WRITE, ENTER 4-BYTE ADDRESS MODE, and EXIT 4-BYTE ADDRESS MODE
command.
But I don't recall seeing any ill effects last time I tested this on my
Micron SPI flash, so I'm still mildly confused.)
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-10 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-07 1:16 [PATCH 0/8] mtd: spi-nor: refactor wait-till-ready Brian Norris
2014-08-07 1:16 ` [PATCH 1/8] mtd: spi-nor: eliminate duplicate spi_nor_wait_till_{, fsr}_ready() code Brian Norris
2014-08-07 14:23 ` Marek Vasut
2014-08-09 6:25 ` Huang Shijie
2014-08-11 17:59 ` Brian Norris
2014-09-10 7:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/10] " Brian Norris
2014-08-07 1:16 ` [PATCH 2/8] mtd: spi-nor: handle timeout errors in spi_nor_write() Brian Norris
2014-08-07 14:23 ` Marek Vasut
2014-08-09 7:37 ` Huang Shijie
2014-08-07 1:16 ` [PATCH 3/8] mtd: spi-nor: move "wait-till-ready" checks into erase/write functions Brian Norris
2014-08-07 14:24 ` Marek Vasut
2014-08-09 8:42 ` Huang Shijie
2014-08-11 18:23 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-12 1:37 ` Huang Shijie
2014-08-07 1:16 ` [PATCH 4/8] mtd: m25p80: drop wait-till-ready checks Brian Norris
2014-08-07 14:24 ` Marek Vasut
2014-08-07 1:16 ` [PATCH 5/8] mtd: fsl-quadspi: " Brian Norris
2014-08-07 14:24 ` Marek Vasut
2014-08-07 1:17 ` [PATCH 6/8] mtd: spi-nor: drop replaceable wait-till-ready function pointer Brian Norris
2014-08-07 14:25 ` Marek Vasut
2014-08-09 9:53 ` Huang Shijie
2014-08-11 18:43 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-12 1:16 ` Huang Shijie
2014-09-10 7:02 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-12 5:13 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-08-12 5:14 ` Rafał Miłecki
2014-08-07 1:17 ` [PATCH 7/8] mtd: spi-nor: factor out write_enable() for erase commands Brian Norris
2014-08-07 14:25 ` Marek Vasut
2014-08-09 10:52 ` Huang Shijie
2014-08-11 18:48 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-12 0:59 ` Huang Shijie
2014-09-10 7:05 ` Brian Norris
2014-09-10 15:20 ` Huang Shijie
2014-09-10 7:47 ` Brian Norris
2014-09-10 16:12 ` Huang Shijie
2014-09-10 23:25 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2014-11-05 10:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Brian Norris
2014-11-06 3:39 ` Huang Shijie
2014-12-01 8:19 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-07 1:17 ` [RFC 8/8] debug: mtd: spi-nor: add BUG_ON() prints to check for !ready Brian Norris
2014-08-07 14:26 ` Marek Vasut
2014-11-05 10:10 ` [PATCH 0/8] mtd: spi-nor: refactor wait-till-ready Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140910232526.GI18411@ld-irv-0074 \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=shijie.huang@intel.com \
--cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox