Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] nand: OMAP collected fixes

Ezequiel Garcia
2014-09-22T12:52:55Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1360 bytes --]

On 09/22/2014 09:22 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi Ezequiel,
>
> On 09/20/2014 07:53 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> I've collected all the changes recently discussed in a whole patchset.
>> If you are just reading this for the first time please take a look at:
>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg110965.html
>> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg110958.html
>>
>> As requested by Roger, the omap_elm is a 'bool' driver now. The plan
>> is to merge it inside omap2_nand, but my queue is really filled, so
>> if anyone feels like doing, please be my guest.
>>
>> Although I'm hoping this to be the last round, feedback and testing
>> is welcome.
>
> Patches 3 and 4 still have checkpatch issues.
>

I think you didn't look at them in detail. Unless I'm missing something,
it's just warning about MAINTAINERS update:

WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#16:
drivers/mtd/{devices/elm.c => nand/omap_elm.c} | 0

WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#13:
drivers/mtd/nand/{omap2.c => omap2_nand.c} | 0

This driver is not in MAINTAINERS. If you want to start maintaining it,
it'd be good to add you to MAINTAINERS so people Cc you properly on patches.

--
Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]