Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] nand: OMAP collected fixes

Roger Quadros
2014-09-22T15:14:25Z

On 09/22/2014 03:51 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>
>
> On 09/22/2014 09:22 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Hi Ezequiel,
>>
>> On 09/20/2014 07:53 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>> I've collected all the changes recently discussed in a whole patchset.
>>> If you are just reading this for the first time please take a look at:
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg110965.html
>>> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg110958.html
>>>
>>> As requested by Roger, the omap_elm is a 'bool' driver now. The plan
>>> is to merge it inside omap2_nand, but my queue is really filled, so
>>> if anyone feels like doing, please be my guest.
>>>
>>> Although I'm hoping this to be the last round, feedback and testing
>>> is welcome.
>>
>> Patches 3 and 4 still have checkpatch issues.
>>
>
> I think you didn't look at them in detail. Unless I'm missing something,
> it's just warning about MAINTAINERS update:
>
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #16:
> drivers/mtd/{devices/elm.c => nand/omap_elm.c} | 0
>
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #13:
> drivers/mtd/nand/{omap2.c => omap2_nand.c} | 0
>
> This driver is not in MAINTAINERS. If you want to start maintaining it,
> it'd be good to add you to MAINTAINERS so people Cc you properly on patches.
>

Sorry for the noise. I was re-generating the patch without the rename detection flag
causing errors which are present in the original file itself.

cheers,
-roger