From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pd0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XW8uV-0005C9-Sz for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:04:32 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id z10so3648693pdj.21 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:04:07 -0700 From: Brian Norris To: Ezequiel Garcia Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: nand: Force omap_elm to be built as a module if omap2_nand is a module Message-ID: <20140922190407.GU1193@ld-irv-0074> References: <1410443224-18477-1-git-send-email-ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar> <1410443224-18477-4-git-send-email-ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar> <5412B66F.8050505@ti.com> <20140912165636.GA7276@arch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140912165636.GA7276@arch> Cc: Tony Lindgren , pekon , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Roger Quadros List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 05:56:36PM +0100, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Ultimately, I don't care much as I don't think anyone will build it as a module, > except maybe for testing the driver under probe/remove cycles. I see that you sort of answered one of my questions here. On what do you base this claim? I see maintstream distros are gaining support for some common ARM platforms, and I bet they ship loadable modules. Or are you seeing otherwise? Brian