From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1XfxyO-0000oC-7v for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:25:09 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hi2so5638867wib.3 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 23:24:43 +0200 From: Frans Klaver To: Alexander Holler Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Fix common bug in most nand drivers not showing a device in sysfs Message-ID: <20141019212443.GA9322@gmail.com> References: <1401142372-14148-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> <543F678E.1030401@ahsoftware.de> <54413B9B.9030702@ahsoftware.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54413B9B.9030702@ahsoftware.de> Cc: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 05:54:03PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote: > I assume the result will be just 21 one-line-patches anyway, missing > the chance to avoid similiar silly patch series in the future by > creating a common function (which even reduces code size over all). That's to be expected, yes. A single patch may even be defensible. I share your concern that it's easier to get it wrong than it is to get it right, though. > So, if you like, just add my Signed-off-by too, there isn't really much > one could do wrong. ;) Sure. Frans