From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: should nand driver create ECC for a page after ERASE cmd?
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:41:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141222184111.GD9759@ld-irv-0074> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5497150A.9090304@rempel-privat.de>
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 07:44:26PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Am 21.12.2014 um 17:28 schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> > Well, actually it depends on your NAND/ECC controller capabilities (but
> > given your discussion with Richard on IRC, I guess you already
> > understood that ;-))
> >
> > 1) Wiser controllers are generating 0xff ECC bytes for a data chunk
> > (chunk == ECC step size) filled with 0xff. With BCH algorithms this is
> > easily done by XORing the ECC bytes with the appropriate pattern (see
> > soft BCH implementation)
> > 2) Some controller just verify if the data chunk + ECC bytes are all
> > 0xff before passing it to the ECC engine. If they are filled with 0xff
> > the ECC correction is bypassed.
> > This method has one drawback: it does not properly handle bitflips
> > occurring in erased pages (if one bitflip occurs the NAND controller
> > consider the chunk as not empty, and pass it to the BCH engine).
> > 3) The controller does not handle erased pages at all, and in this case
> > you'll have to manually test it (as Ezequiel suggested) when you
> > encounter an ECC error.
>
> Boris,
> i think your explanation can be placed to mtd web page, some where here :)
> http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/general.html#L_mtd_tests
Patches are welcome:
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/general.html#L_mtdwww
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-22 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-20 8:42 should nand driver create ECC for a page after ERASE cmd? Oleksij Rempel
2014-12-21 1:46 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-12-21 14:13 ` Oleksij Rempel
2014-12-21 16:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-12-21 18:44 ` Oleksij Rempel
2014-12-22 18:41 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2014-12-22 19:50 ` Oleksij Rempel
2014-12-23 11:27 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141222184111.GD9759@ld-irv-0074 \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox