From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@imgtec.com>
Cc: bpqw@micron.com, Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@imgtec.com>,
frankliu@micron.com, Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, arnaud.mouiche@invoxia.com,
Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>,
James Hartley <james.hartley@imgtec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mtd: nand: Check length of ID before reading bits per cell
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:38:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150105203808.GE9759@ld-irv-0074> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417525136-25731-2-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@imgtec.com>
A little tangential to the big-picture discussion, but I'll get this out
there:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 09:58:51AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> The table-based NAND identification currently reads the number
> of bits per cell from the 3rd byte of the extended ID. This is done
> for the so-called 'full ID' devices; i.e. devices that have a known
> length ID.
>
> However, if the ID length is shorter than three, there's no 3rd byte,
> and so it's wrong to read the bits per cell from there. Fix this by
> adding a check for the ID length.
You're right about the problem, but I'm not sure about the fix. I
actually don't know why we are using the ID bytes to guess at the number
of bits per cell here; the point of the full-id checks is that with some
NAND, we just can't decode all the information reliably from the ID.
I'd kinda rather just see bits-per-cell represented as a separate bit;
either a new field, or in the 'options' field.
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@imgtec.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index 5b5c627..a4c9cee 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -3589,7 +3589,8 @@ static bool find_full_id_nand(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> mtd->erasesize = type->erasesize;
> mtd->oobsize = type->oobsize;
>
> - chip->bits_per_cell = nand_get_bits_per_cell(id_data[2]);
> + if (type->id_len > 2)
> + chip->bits_per_cell = nand_get_bits_per_cell(id_data[2]);
> chip->chipsize = (uint64_t)type->chipsize << 20;
> chip->options |= type->options;
> chip->ecc_strength_ds = NAND_ECC_STRENGTH(type);
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-05 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-02 12:58 [PATCH 0/6] SPI NAND for everyone Ezequiel Garcia
2014-12-02 12:58 ` [PATCH 1/6] mtd: nand: Check length of ID before reading bits per cell Ezequiel Garcia
2014-12-13 0:51 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2015-01-05 20:38 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2014-12-02 12:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] mtd: nand: Add JEDEC manufacturer ID for Gigadevice Ezequiel Garcia
2014-12-13 0:49 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2015-04-21 23:04 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-04-22 17:47 ` Brian Norris
2014-12-02 12:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] mtd: nand: Allow to set a per-device ECC layout Ezequiel Garcia
2014-12-13 0:34 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2014-12-02 12:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] mtd: Introduce SPI NAND framework Ezequiel Garcia
2014-12-15 21:18 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2014-12-16 0:08 ` Ezequiel Garcia
[not found] ` <87F60714EC601C4C83DFF1D2E3D390A049EE77@NTXXIAMBX02.xacn.micron.com>
2014-12-22 4:34 ` Qi Wang 王起 (qiwang)
2014-12-22 15:44 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-05 20:47 ` Brian Norris
2014-12-02 12:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] mtd: spi-nand: Add devicetree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2014-12-13 1:27 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2014-12-02 12:58 ` [PATCH 6/6] mtd: spi-nand: Support common SPI NAND devices Ezequiel Garcia
2014-12-13 1:27 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2014-12-15 19:36 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-12-15 20:17 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
[not found] ` <87F60714EC601C4C83DFF1D2E3D390A049EE65@NTXXIAMBX02.xacn.micron.com>
2014-12-22 4:34 ` Qi Wang 王起 (qiwang)
2014-12-22 16:16 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2014-12-10 17:41 ` [PATCH 0/6] SPI NAND for everyone Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-06 3:30 ` Brian Norris
2015-01-06 21:03 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-01-07 0:55 ` Qi Wang 王起 (qiwang)
2015-01-07 12:13 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150105203808.GE9759@ld-irv-0074 \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
--cc=arnaud.mouiche@invoxia.com \
--cc=bpqw@micron.com \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@imgtec.com \
--cc=frankliu@micron.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@imgtec.com \
--cc=james.hartley@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox