From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Y9IHq-0000au-8N for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 18:58:27 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id q108so3994069qgd.1 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:58:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:57:58 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Steve deRosier Subject: Re: NAND ECC capabilities Message-ID: <20150108185758.GS9759@ld-irv-0074> References: <54AE04ED.8080002@vanguardiasur.com.ar> <0D23F1ECC880A74392D56535BCADD73526C0EA9A@NTXBOIMBX03.micron.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: "Jeff Lauruhn \(jlauruhn\)" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Ezequiel Garcia List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 09:09:20AM -0800, Steve deRosier wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Jeff Lauruhn (jlauruhn) > wrote: > > You might find this interesting http://www.cyclicdesign.com/index.php/ecc-trends-in-nand-flash. Either Jeff sent this privately, or his mail is getting bounced by the mailing list.